Time | Subject | # followups | From |
Sun, 30 Aug 2009 |
16:41 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(1) |
David Laight |
14:08 |
Re: tstile syndrome |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
14:06 |
Re: tstile syndrome |
(3) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
09:12 |
Re: tstile syndrome |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
08:17 |
Re: tstile syndrome |
(1) |
David Holland |
08:15 |
Re: tstile syndrome |
(1) |
David Holland |
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 |
22:57 |
Re: NFS experts: stale vnode pointer in ufs_fhtovp |
(1) |
David Holland |
22:05 |
NFS experts: stale vnode pointer in ufs_fhtovp ? |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
14:45 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
10:11 |
Re: kern/41923: assertion "cur != owner" failed |
(0) |
Andrew Doran |
10:05 |
Re: tstile syndrome |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
10:04 |
Re: tstile syndrome |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
10:02 |
Re: tstile syndrome |
(1) |
Andrew Doran |
09:56 |
Re: tstile syndrome |
(2) |
Andrew Doran |
09:49 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(1) |
Andrew Doran |
07:38 |
Re: Reclaiming vnodes |
(0) |
Adam Hamsik |
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 |
21:59 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
19:59 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(0) |
Elad Efrat |
17:08 |
Re: merge for gt(4) and Marvell SoC |
(0) |
FUKAUMI Naoki |
Thu, 27 Aug 2009 |
20:00 |
Re: kern/41923: assertion "cur != owner" failed |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
13:00 |
Re: tstile syndrome |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
11:53 |
Re: tstile syndrome |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
11:09 |
tstile syndrome |
(3) |
Manuel Bouyer |
00:21 |
Re: kern/41923: assertion "cur != owner" failed |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
Wed, 26 Aug 2009 |
23:05 |
Re: kern/41923: assertion "cur != owner" failed |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
22:56 |
Re: CVS commit: src |
(0) |
Elad Efrat |
21:05 |
Re: CVS commit: src |
(1) |
David Holland |
20:21 |
Re: CVS commit: src |
(1) |
Elad Efrat |
20:07 |
Re: CVS commit: src |
(1) |
David Holland |
12:29 |
Re: NFS hangs (again) |
(0) |
Christos Zoulas |
00:13 |
Re: NFS hangs (again) |
(1) |
Brian Marcotte |
Tue, 25 Aug 2009 |
22:10 |
Re: NFS hangs (again) |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
21:13 |
Re: NFS hangs (again) |
(1) |
Christos Zoulas |
20:19 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
20:18 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(0) |
Elad Efrat |
20:09 |
Re: NFS hangs (again) |
(1) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
20:04 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(1) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
20:00 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(2) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
18:08 |
Re: NFS hangs (again) |
(1) |
Christos Zoulas |
18:07 |
Re: NFS hangs (again) |
(1) |
Christos Zoulas |
18:06 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
Elad Efrat |
17:34 |
Re: NFS hangs (again) |
(1) |
Izumi Tsutsui |
17:18 |
Re: NFS hangs (again) |
(1) |
Brian Marcotte |
15:44 |
Re: Reclaiming vnodes |
(3) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
15:43 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
14:31 |
Re: NFS hangs (again) |
(1) |
Christos Zoulas |
12:58 |
Re: merge for gt(4) and Marvell SoC |
(1) |
KIYOHARA Takashi |
01:34 |
Re: NFS hangs (again) |
(1) |
Brian Marcotte |
Mon, 24 Aug 2009 |
23:41 |
kern/41923: assertion "cur != owner" failed |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
23:15 |
Re: NFS hangs (again) |
(0) |
Brian Marcotte |
20:12 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(1) |
Mike Pumford |
19:32 |
NFS hangs (again) |
(0) |
Brian Marcotte |
17:14 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
15:22 |
mount hang attempting to mount a umass device |
(0) |
Jeremy C. Reed |
13:04 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
Simon Burge |
12:31 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
12:27 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
Christoph Egger |
11:47 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
10:54 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
Christoph Egger |
09:58 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
09:48 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
Christoph Egger |
09:05 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
05:10 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
Christoph Egger |
Sun, 23 Aug 2009 |
22:35 |
re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
matthew green |
22:14 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
22:03 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
21:39 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
Christoph Egger |
20:30 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(0) |
Martin Husemann |
20:23 |
re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(2) |
matthew green |
20:19 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
20:08 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
Martin Husemann |
20:01 |
re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
matthew green |
19:57 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(2) |
Michael |
19:49 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
19:06 |
re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(2) |
matthew green |
18:31 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
Elad Efrat |
15:15 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
09:51 |
Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma |
(1) |
Martin Husemann |
09:37 |
basic support for (software concept) "pci domains" |
(1) |
matthew green |
Sat, 22 Aug 2009 |
14:26 |
Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processe |
(0) |
Christos Zoulas |
12:23 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(2) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
11:29 |
Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processe |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
08:25 |
Re: proposed sysctl(9) changes |
(0) |
David Laight |
Fri, 21 Aug 2009 |
22:44 |
Re: proposed sysctl(9) changes |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
22:35 |
proposed sysctl(9) changes |
(2) |
David Young |
15:19 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
Elad Efrat |
11:34 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
10:32 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
10:27 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
10:19 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
06:02 |
Re: merge for gt(4) and Marvell SoC |
(1) |
KIYOHARA Takashi |
01:52 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
Elad Efrat |
Thu, 20 Aug 2009 |
20:46 |
Re: merge for gt(4) and Marvell SoC |
(1) |
Robert Swindells |
17:23 |
Re: clearing bogus journal |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
17:21 |
Re: clearing bogus journal |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
06:06 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(0) |
David Holland |
06:05 |
Re: Reclaiming vnodes |
(0) |
David Holland |
Wed, 19 Aug 2009 |
20:22 |
Listing of small businesses for the United States |
(0) |
Ilene Fowler |
13:00 |
Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processe |
(1) |
Christos Zoulas |
Tue, 18 Aug 2009 |
21:26 |
re: uarea swap-out |
(1) |
matthew green |
21:10 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
20:57 |
Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processe |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
14:11 |
Re: clearing bogus journal |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
13:12 |
Re: clearing bogus journal |
(1) |
Izumi Tsutsui |
12:57 |
Re: clearing bogus journal |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
12:44 |
Re: clearing bogus journal |
(1) |
Izumi Tsutsui |
12:20 |
Re: clearing bogus journal |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
12:20 |
Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processe |
(1) |
Christos Zoulas |
12:15 |
Re: clearing bogus journal |
(1) |
Izumi Tsutsui |
Mon, 17 Aug 2009 |
21:52 |
clearing bogus journal |
(4) |
Manuel Bouyer |
21:35 |
Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processe |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
21:15 |
Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
21:08 |
Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
20:15 |
Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
19:46 |
Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) |
(1) |
David Young |
19:34 |
Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
19:30 |
Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) |
(1) |
David Young |
19:30 |
Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
19:29 |
Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) |
(0) |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
19:26 |
Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) |
(2) |
David Young |
19:25 |
Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
19:20 |
Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? |
(0) |
Anders Magnusson |
19:09 |
re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? |
(2) |
matthew green |
19:07 |
Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) |
(1) |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
18:58 |
Re: Reclaiming vnodes |
(0) |
Adam Hamsik |
18:57 |
Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) |
(2) |
David Young |
17:32 |
Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
17:29 |
Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? |
(1) |
Matt Thomas |
17:19 |
Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
17:14 |
Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? |
(0) |
der Mouse |
16:58 |
Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? |
(2) |
Matt Thomas |
16:52 |
Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
16:49 |
Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? |
(2) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
16:46 |
Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
16:39 |
should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
15:16 |
possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processes ca |
(1) |
Christos Zoulas |
14:10 |
Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) |
(0) |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
14:04 |
Solved! (was: why is this needed?) |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
13:16 |
Re: Reclaiming vnodes |
(1) |
Martin Husemann |
12:58 |
why is this needed? |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
12:49 |
Re: Interrupt problem on Sony Vaio BZ11XN |
(0) |
Ignatios Souvatzis |
12:18 |
Re: Reclaiming vnodes |
(2) |
Adam Hamsik |
11:44 |
Re: assertion "solocked(sb->sb_so)" failed [Re: di |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
11:00 |
Re: Reclaiming vnodes |
(1) |
Martin Husemann |
09:45 |
Reclaiming vnodes |
(2) |
Adam Hamsik |
03:48 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(1) |
der Mouse |
03:33 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(0) |
Matt Thomas |
03:19 |
re: uarea swap-out |
(1) |
matthew green |
02:54 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(1) |
Matt Thomas |
02:42 |
DIOCGDISKINFO for dk(4) |
(0) |
jakllsch |
01:42 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(1) |
der Mouse |
01:16 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(3) |
Matt Thomas |
00:55 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(0) |
Matt Thomas |
00:27 |
Re: uarea swap-out |
(1) |
der Mouse |
00:07 |
uarea swap-out |
(3) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
Sun, 16 Aug 2009 |
22:19 |
Re: assertion "solocked(sb->sb_so)" failed [Re: di |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
19:31 |
assertion "solocked(sb->sb_so)" failed [Re: diagno |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
Sat, 15 Aug 2009 |
12:12 |
Re: merge for gt(4) and Marvell SoC |
(0) |
KIYOHARA Takashi |
09:42 |
Re: ALL kernel can not be built |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
08:44 |
ALL kernel can not be built |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
01:21 |
re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(0) |
matthew green |
Fri, 14 Aug 2009 |
22:22 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(1) |
Mark Davies |
20:44 |
Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
20:40 |
NFS hangs |
(0) |
Brian Marcotte |
14:06 |
Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m |
(0) |
Matthias Scheler |
12:57 |
Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
12:41 |
Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m |
(1) |
Matthias Scheler |
08:46 |
Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
Thu, 13 Aug 2009 |
18:57 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
Tonnerre LOMBARD |
18:55 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
Tonnerre LOMBARD |
07:46 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
Alan Barrett |
06:19 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
Iain Hibbert |
06:08 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(0) |
Jed Davis |
01:39 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
James Chacon |
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 |
22:08 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(2) |
Tonnerre LOMBARD |
21:17 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
Iain Hibbert |
20:33 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(2) |
Tonnerre LOMBARD |
18:29 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
Eric Haszlakiewicz |
16:50 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
David Holland |
16:42 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
Eric Haszlakiewicz |
14:53 |
Re: diagnostic assertion "solocked2(so, so2)" fail |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
13:47 |
Re: diagnostic assertion "solocked2(so, so2)" fail |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
10:39 |
Interrupt problem on Sony Vaio BZ11XN |
(1) |
Gilbert Fernandes |
01:45 |
Re: kern/41874: in-kernel NFS server hates network |
(0) |
Erik Fair |
01:31 |
Re: merge for gt(4) and Marvell SoC |
(2) |
Simon Burge |
Tue, 11 Aug 2009 |
22:30 |
ZFS, ARC, and UBC |
(0) |
Jason Thorpe |
18:01 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
David Holland |
17:42 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
Eric Haszlakiewicz |
17:16 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
Peter Seebach |
16:35 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
David Holland |
15:16 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(0) |
Brian Buhrow |
14:18 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Quentin Garnier |
11:09 |
Re: diagnostic assertion "solocked2(so, so2)" fail |
(1) |
Jachym Holecek |
09:09 |
diagnostic assertion "solocked2(so, so2)" failed |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
08:26 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
Peter Seebach |
07:50 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
David Holland |
07:49 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(2) |
der Mouse |
07:48 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
David Holland |
07:19 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
Matthew Mondor |
07:18 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
Peter Seebach |