[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?)
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:33:48PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> Am 17.08.2009 um 21:30 schrieb David Young:
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:25:33PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
>>> Am 17.08.2009 um 20:57 schrieb David Young:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
>>>>> While here, I removed the unneeded and empty gscpcib_childdetach
>>>> The gscpcib_childdetach function, empty though it is, is needed so
>>>> children can be detached. Please put that back. :-)
>>> hmm. Other gpio drivers seem not to have it, and work nonetheless
>>> gpiosim(4)). why is it needed in this particular case?
>> It is needed so that we can detach the children of gscpcib(4).
>> According to the manual page, those children are an ISA bus and a GPIO
> GPIO did not even work until I fixed it.
Right, and ISA only has a detachment routine in my working copy. So
it's not a functional regression that any user will see. Don't worry,
I'll take care of all of it in a commit later today.
David Young OJC Technologies
dyoung%ojctech.com@localhost Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933
Main Index |
Thread Index |