Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?)

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:57:09PM -0500, David Young wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
> > While here, I removed the unneeded and empty gscpcib_childdetach  
> > function.
> 
> The gscpcib_childdetach function, empty though it is, is needed so that
> children can be detached.  Please put that back. :-)

Yes and no. config_detach works, but detachdevbyname rejects that.
I am not sure if the latter is correct to do so.

Joerg