[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?)
Am 17.08.2009 um 21:26 schrieb David Young:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:06:14PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:57:09PM -0500, David Young wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 04:04:08PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
While here, I removed the unneeded and empty gscpcib_childdetach
The gscpcib_childdetach function, empty though it is, is needed so
children can be detached. Please put that back. :-)
Yes and no. config_detach works, but detachdevbyname rejects that.
I am not sure if the latter is correct to do so.
I am sure that the latter is correct to do so. config_detach() should
probably require the parent to provide a child-detached routine, too,
but it's not necessary to discuss that before fixing the regression.
I contest there is a regression. Please explain the regression.
Main Index |
Thread Index |