[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processes can hold locks
On Aug 22, 12:29pm, rmind%netbsd.org@localhost (Mindaugas Rasiukevicius) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processes can hold lock
| Yes, but we ought to keep such interface stable, since it's a lower level
| synchronisation primitive. That is, cv_wait()/cv_wait_sig() should stay
| as functions (even if it would cost additional function-call).
Ok, I can easily do that. Should I commit my change or someone is planning
to implement a better fix?
Main Index |
Thread Index |