tech-userlevel by date

Last updated: Sun Aug 04 15:56:42 2013
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 1 of 2009/06
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]

TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Tue, 30 Jun 2009
10:32 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Roy Marples
06:53 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) David Laight
03:41 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) James K. Lowden
03:04 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) David Holland
03:00 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) David Holland
02:52 Re: "ZeroCD" filesystem mount? (0) David Holland
Mon, 29 Jun 2009
09:23 "ZeroCD" filesystem mount? (1) Iain Hibbert
07:28 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Tonnerre LOMBARD
07:27 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Tonnerre LOMBARD
Sun, 28 Jun 2009
02:53 Re: terminfo implementation (0) Greg A. Woods
02:41 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) David Holland
02:26 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Greg A. Woods
02:02 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Greg A. Woods
Sat, 27 Jun 2009
20:46 Re: terminfo implementation (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
18:40 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) David Holland
12:26 Re: terminfo implementation (0) Roy Marples
10:36 Re: terminfo implementation (1) Adam Hoka
10:02 terminfo implementation (5) Roy Marples
10:00 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) David Laight
08:25 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Iain Hibbert
07:30 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (2) David Holland
07:11 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) David Holland
Fri, 26 Jun 2009
21:31 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Iain Hibbert
19:09 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
18:20 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (2) David Holland
14:33 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) der Mouse
14:30 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) der Mouse
11:43 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
11:02 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Iain Hibbert
08:29 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Martin Husemann
07:40 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (2) David Holland
07:04 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Roy Marples
07:02 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Roy Marples
06:51 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) David Laight
05:15 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (4) James K. Lowden
Thu, 25 Jun 2009
12:31 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Marc Balmer
10:06 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Adam Hoka
08:46 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Manuel Bouyer
08:17 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Iain Hibbert
07:56 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Iain Hibbert
03:57 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (2) Greg A. Woods
01:20 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) James Chacon
01:15 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (2) der Mouse
00:43 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
Wed, 24 Jun 2009
23:47 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) James Chacon
23:07 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Manuel Bouyer
21:41 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) der Mouse
21:25 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) der Mouse
21:15 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (2) Marc Balmer
21:11 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (3) Marc Balmer
20:45 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Marc Balmer
20:25 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Greg A. Woods
19:44 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Steven M. Bellovin
19:43 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Manuel Bouyer
19:01 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (2) Marc Balmer
18:34 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Steven M. Bellovin
18:32 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Marc Balmer
18:31 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Greg A. Woods
18:24 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
07:51 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Marc Balmer
06:57 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) der Mouse
06:22 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (2) Marc Balmer
06:05 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Marc Balmer
04:41 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) David Holland
04:14 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) David Holland
Tue, 23 Jun 2009
22:07 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Adam Hoka
22:04 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Tonnerre LOMBARD
21:45 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Arnaud Lacombe
21:14 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (3) Matthew Mondor
19:01 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Marc Balmer
17:36 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (2) Iain Hibbert
17:34 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Adam Hoka
16:54 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
16:50 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) David Young
16:23 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
15:35 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Martin Husemann
15:34 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Matthew Mondor
15:30 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (4) Thor Lancelot Simon
15:21 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Marc Balmer
15:15 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
15:06 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (2) Marc Balmer
15:05 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
14:58 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (4) Matthew Mondor
14:56 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Adam Hoka
14:46 Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (0) Christos Zoulas
14:28 strtonum(3) from OpenBSD? (5) Marc Balmer
Mon, 22 Jun 2009
17:39 divert 1000s of fresh new visitors daily to Your w (0) Top Seo Secrets
Fri, 19 Jun 2009
17:26 Re: Suggested change of ctype.h (0) David Holland
Tue, 16 Jun 2009
20:20 Re: problem with ntpdate(8) in current rc order (0) Jukka Salmi
17:24 Re: problem with ntpdate(8) in current rc order (1) Alan Barrett
16:58 problem with ntpdate(8) in current rc order (1) Jukka Salmi
14:49 Re: Testing xmlgrep (0) nhat . minh . le
13:46 Re: Testing xmlgrep (1) matthew sporleder
Mon, 15 Jun 2009
23:22 Re: Testing xmlgrep (0) Jeremy C. Reed
22:26 Testing xmlgrep (2) nhat . minh . le
13:21 Re: Suggested change of ctype.h (1) Juergen Buchmueller
09:50 Re: Suggested change of ctype.h (1) Alan Barrett
Sun, 14 Jun 2009
16:58 Re: Suggested change of ctype.h (0) der Mouse
08:26 Re: Suggested change of ctype.h (1) Juergen Buchmueller
07:16 Re: Suggested change of ctype.h (1) Ignatios Souvatzis
02:27 Re: Suggested change of ctype.h (1) der Mouse
Sat, 13 Jun 2009
19:45 Re: Suggested change of ctype.h (2) David Laight
18:00 Re: Suggested change of ctype.h (0) Christos Zoulas
17:52 Suggested change of ctype.h (2) Juergen Buchmueller
10:49 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Manuel Bouyer
09:56 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
Thu, 11 Jun 2009
15:33 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) David Young
15:09 re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) matthew green
09:26 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
09:17 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) Christoph Egger
Tue, 09 Jun 2009
20:03 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Quentin Garnier
19:47 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Greg A. Woods
02:02 Re: terminfo vs termcap (0) James K. Lowden
Mon, 08 Jun 2009
11:13 Re: terminfo vs termcap (0) Julian Coleman
10:17 Re: terminfo vs termcap (0) Thomas Dickey
10:02 Re: terminfo vs termcap (0) Julian Coleman
09:35 Re: terminfo vs termcap (2) Roy Marples
08:46 Re: terminfo vs termcap (1) Roy Marples
00:40 Re: terminfo vs termcap (1) Christos Zoulas
Sun, 07 Jun 2009
11:10 Re: terminfo vs termcap (0) Thomas Dickey
10:35 Re: terminfo vs termcap (3) Martin Husemann
Sat, 06 Jun 2009
22:25 Re: terminfo vs termcap (0) der Mouse
14:44 Re: terminfo vs termcap (2) Roy Marples
11:31 Re: terminfo vs termcap (0) Thomas Dickey
11:30 Re: terminfo vs termcap (1) Thomas Dickey
11:07 Re: terminfo vs termcap (2) Martin Husemann
03:30 Re: terminfo vs termcap (1) Roy Marples
02:55 Re: terminfo vs termcap (2) der Mouse
Fri, 05 Jun 2009
21:38 Re: terminfo vs termcap (1) Thomas Dickey
20:34 Re: terminfo vs termcap (1) Christos Zoulas
19:33 Re: terminfo vs termcap (0) Thomas Dickey
19:04 Re: terminfo vs termcap (0) Roy Marples
19:01 Re: terminfo vs termcap (1) Roy Marples
18:37 Re: terminfo vs termcap (1) Christos Zoulas
15:48 Re: terminfo vs termcap (3) Julian Coleman
11:08 Re: terminfo vs termcap (0) Roy Marples
11:05 terminfo vs termcap (2) Roy Marples
02:47 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) der Mouse
Thu, 04 Jun 2009
23:26 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Matthias Drochner
22:28 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Michael
21:42 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) Manuel Bouyer
21:08 Re: Incompatible definition of "struct kevent" in (1) Jaromir Dolecek
21:06 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
20:40 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
20:36 Re: Incompatible definition of "struct kevent" in (0) Matthias Scheler
20:28 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
20:22 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
20:18 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
20:07 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Christoph Egger
18:55 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) Joerg Sonnenberger
18:07 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
18:01 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
18:00 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
17:18 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) Matthias Drochner
17:05 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) der Mouse
16:59 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
16:13 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
16:04 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
15:59 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Magnus Eriksson
15:50 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
14:31 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Peter Seebach
13:36 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
13:27 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
11:27 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
11:02 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Manuel Bouyer
10:37 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) Christoph Egger
10:30 Re: Incompatible definition of "struct kevent" in (0) Matthias Scheler
10:27 Incompatible definition of "struct kevent" in "sys (2) Matthias Scheler
10:21 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
10:15 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
10:11 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Christoph Egger
09:48 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
09:29 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Alan Barrett
08:10 tmux and UTF-8 (Re: Replacing window(1) with tmux) (0) Geert Hendrickx
07:46 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Christoph Egger
07:33 Re: Replacing window(1) with tmux (0) Geert Hendrickx
07:31 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) David Holland
07:23 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (3) Christoph Egger
07:18 [no subject] (0) Christoph Egger
05:46 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
00:39 Re: Replacing window(1) with tmux (0) der Mouse
Wed, 03 Jun 2009
22:55 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Peter Seebach
21:28 [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (3) Christoph Egger
19:45 Re: Extending cp(1) to copy sparse files with -s s (0) Matthew Mondor
18:35 Re: Extending cp(1) to copy sparse files with -s s (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
18:20 Extending cp(1) to copy sparse files with -s switc (1) Matthew Mondor
15:12 Re: Replacing window(1) with tmux (0) der Mouse
14:42 Re: Replacing window(1) with tmux (1) Peter Bex
13:30 Re: Replacing window(1) with tmux (3) Geert Hendrickx
13:22 Re: Replacing window(1) with tmux (1) Roy Marples
13:10 Re: Replacing window(1) with tmux (1) der Mouse
12:52 Re: Replacing window(1) with tmux (1) Geert Hendrickx
10:48 Replacing window(1) with tmux (2) Roy Marples
Tue, 02 Jun 2009
17:11 Re: wedge like devices and newfs (0) Adam Hamsik
17:02 Re: wedge like devices and newfs (0) Adam Hamsik
17:00 Re: wedge like devices and newfs (1) David Laight
14:17 Regular Expression Testing (0) Matthias-Christian Ott
13:11 Re: wedge like devices and newfs (1) Manuel Bouyer
11:12 Re: wedge like devices and newfs (2) Adam Hamsik
09:53 Re: wedge like devices and newfs (1) Manuel Bouyer


Page 1 of 2009/06
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home


Mail converted by MHonArc