[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: strtonum(3) from OpenBSD?
>> [123 lines of verbatim quotes, most of which didn't need quoting]
Please trim your quotes for relevance! [This is actually addressed to
everyone who doesn't trim; you are, sadly, far from alone in that.]
> what I find amusing is that people come up with their own
> implemetation of such a function instead of simply accept the fact
> that there is a function in OpenBSD and FreeBSD that is accepted by
> many good folks...
I don't see any inconsistency between accepting that fact and rolling
your own. I can accept the fact that it exists and still think it's a
badly designed API, to the point where I find it cleaner to build my
own than use that one.
> strtonum(3) may not be perfect, indeed it has some issues when it
> comes to an internationalized OS. But why be special and not have a
> function that other BSDs have as well?
Because it's badly designed. Popularity does not make a badly designed
API suitable for inclusion in NetBSD.
> Personally I find
> - it makes no sense to create a NetBSD specific equivalent of a
> function that other BSDs have
I disagree, when the function's interface is as poorly designed as this
> - It would ease porting software between the BSDs if we had this
> function somewhere
True. It might be worth putting in libcompat or some such.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Main Index |
Thread Index |