[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: terminfo vs termcap
On Friday 05 June 2009 16:48:31 Julian Coleman wrote:
> > So I looked into what we have, and I think we can do quite a bit by
> > providing libterminfo to read the terminfo db's and provide termcap
> > compat functions and a basic tic compiler to convert termcap(5) and
> > terminfo(5) sources into terminfo.dbs. curses(3) would have to be
> > re-tooled around libterminfo of course.
> I did wonder about creating a terminfo compatible part of our libterm.
> This would allow us to support those extra terminfo calls that are not in
> the current libterm. The most useful one to me was tparm().
> I was thinking of still using termcap as the back end. Basically, the
> compatible part would have a mapping between terminfo and termcap
> capabilities. For example, if you called:
> it would translate internally to:
> t_getstr(tc, "DO", NULL, l);
> (Functions without a termcap mapping would be extra). That wouldn't
> involve any changes to the curses library.
How would you cater for codes defined by terminfo but not by termcap?
How would >2 parameters to tparm be handled?
Main Index |
Thread Index |