tech-kern by date

Last updated: Sun Aug 04 15:53:08 2013
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 1 of 2010/06
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]

TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Wed, 30 Jun 2010
23:33 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (1) Rhialto
21:15 MP locking? (2) der Mouse
20:40 Re: Move the vnode lock into file systems (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
19:12 Interesting USB observation (0) John Klos
18:15 Re: Move the vnode lock into file systems (0) Bill Stouder-Studenmund
18:13 Re: Move the vnode lock into file systems (1) Bill Stouder-Studenmund
16:03 Re: PAT support (0) Christoph Egger
15:58 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (1) Chuck Silvers
Tue, 29 Jun 2010
19:41 Re: systems hangs with slow disk - how does FS loc (0) der Mouse
19:24 systems hangs with slow disk - how does FS locking (1) Hubert Feyrer
15:24 Re: Move the vnode lock into file systems (2) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
14:54 Re: Move the vnode lock into file systems (2) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
Mon, 28 Jun 2010
15:06 Re: Move the vnode lock into file systems (0) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
09:47 Re: Move the vnode lock into file systems (0) Andrew Doran
09:06 Re: Move the vnode lock into file systems (2) Andrew Doran
Sun, 27 Jun 2010
21:06 Re: Move the vnode lock into file systems (1) David Holland
16:18 Re: Move the vnode lock into file systems (1) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
02:06 Re: Move the vnode lock into file systems (1) David Holland
Sat, 26 Jun 2010
14:40 Re: kqueue clarification (0) Sad Clouds
13:04 kqueue clarification (1) Sad Clouds
12:02 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (0) der Mouse
12:01 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (0) der Mouse
11:51 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (0) der Mouse
08:39 Move the vnode lock into file systems (3) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
01:45 Re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (0) Izumi Tsutsui
Fri, 25 Jun 2010
21:21 re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (0) matthew green
21:13 re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (1) matthew green
19:27 Re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (1) Hauke Fath
17:22 Re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (0) David Young
16:03 Re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (3) Izumi Tsutsui
15:19 Re: config_mountroot(8) for firmload(9) (Re: [RFC] (0) Izumi Tsutsui
14:52 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (0) Thor Simon
14:26 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
14:18 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
14:06 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (2) Greg Troxel
14:04 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (0) Matthew Mondor
13:42 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (1) Matthew Mondor
13:32 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
13:32 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
13:28 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
13:20 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (2) Thor Simon
13:02 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (1) Matthew Mondor
12:59 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (2) Matthew Mondor
12:53 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (2) Joerg Sonnenberger
12:48 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (1) Greg Troxel
11:54 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (1) Robert Elz
11:13 Re: why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (0) Matthias Scheler
02:56 why not remove AF_LOCAL sockets on last close? (5) Thor Simon
Thu, 24 Jun 2010
03:24 Re: binary plist support (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
Wed, 23 Jun 2010
09:40 Re: Using emap for i386/amd64 early during boot (0) Jean-Yves Migeon
00:12 Re: wedges on vnd(4) patch (0) David Holland
00:10 Re: Using emap for i386/amd64 early during boot (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Tue, 22 Jun 2010
22:50 Re: declarations in switch statements (Re: wedges (0) Eric Haszlakiewicz
22:22 Re: wedges on vnd(4) patch (0) David Laight
21:51 Re: declarations in switch statements (Re: wedges (1) Christos Zoulas
18:24 declarations in switch statements (Re: wedges on v (1) Eric Haszlakiewicz
16:13 Re: VOP_*LOCK* cleanup proposal (0) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
16:02 Re: VOP_*LOCK* cleanup proposal (0) Andrew Doran
15:24 Re: VOP_*LOCK* cleanup proposal (2) Eduardo Horvath
12:44 Re: VOP_*LOCK* cleanup proposal (0) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
12:12 Re: VOP_*LOCK* cleanup proposal (1) Andrew Doran
10:52 Re: VOP_*LOCK* cleanup proposal (1) Andrew Doran
08:27 VOP_*LOCK* cleanup proposal (2) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
Mon, 21 Jun 2010
23:10 Re: wedges on vnd(4) patch (0) Christos Zoulas
22:23 Re: wedges on vnd(4) patch (2) Christos Zoulas
22:11 Re: wedges on vnd(4) patch (2) Eric Haszlakiewicz
19:13 Re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (0) Jochen Kunz
18:52 Re: wedges on vnd(4) patch (1) Jeff Rizzo
15:05 Re: wedges on vnd(4) patch (2) Christos Zoulas
05:33 wedges on vnd(4) patch (1) Jeff Rizzo
00:40 Re: Using emap for i386/amd64 early during boot (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
Sun, 20 Jun 2010
22:39 Re: Using emap for i386/amd64 early during boot (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
22:28 Re: Using emap for i386/amd64 early during boot (0) Jean-Yves Migeon
22:27 Re: Using emap for i386/amd64 early during boot (1) Jean-Yves Migeon
20:19 Re: Using emap for i386/amd64 early during boot (1) David Young
18:00 Re: Using emap for i386/amd64 early during boot (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
17:45 Using emap for i386/amd64 early during boot (2) Jean-Yves Migeon
13:57 Re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (1) Hauke Fath
07:13 re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (1) matthew green
07:00 Re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (1) Jochen Kunz
02:38 re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (1) matthew green
02:31 re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (1) matthew green
02:14 Re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (2) Izumi Tsutsui
01:36 re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (1) matthew green
Sat, 19 Jun 2010
22:37 Re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (0) David Young
19:46 re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (0) matthew green
19:43 Re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (2) Izumi Tsutsui
19:33 Re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (2) David Young
17:28 Re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
17:22 Re: 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (1) David Young
16:57 5.99.30 sparc panic during startup (1) Hauke Fath
04:02 Q about NB5.1 WAPBL (0) Toru Nishimura
Fri, 18 Jun 2010
13:59 Re: config_mountroot(9) for firmload(9) (Re: [RFC] (0) FUKAUMI Naoki
12:07 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (0) Paul Goyette
10:05 config_mountroot(8) for firmload(9) (Re: [RFC] aft (2) Izumi Tsutsui
Thu, 17 Jun 2010
19:04 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (0) Antti Kantee
19:03 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
18:09 re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (2) matthew green
16:42 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (0) Antti Kantee
16:31 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (1) Chuck Silvers
16:21 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
16:07 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (1) Matthew Mondor
15:41 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (0) Chuck Silvers
15:31 Re: Simplelock v.s lock (0) Adam Hoka
15:00 Simplelock v.s lock (1) Putrycy
14:27 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
13:15 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (1) Paul Goyette
10:48 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (1) Antti Kantee
10:26 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (2) Andrew Doran
Wed, 16 Jun 2010
22:57 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (2) Chuck Silvers
22:36 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (1) Paul Goyette
14:31 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
14:08 Re: Removal of recursive vnode locks (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
13:46 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (1) Antti Kantee
13:32 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (1) Paul Goyette
12:44 Re: l_private (Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux (0) Andrew Doran
12:36 Re: Removal of recursive vnode locks (0) Andrew Doran
12:29 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (0) Andrew Doran
12:10 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (0) Antti Kantee
11:58 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (1) Paul Goyette
11:44 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (2) Antti Kantee
11:30 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (0) Paul Goyette
11:26 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (1) Antti Kantee
11:13 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (1) Paul Goyette
10:24 Re: mbuf pool allocator can sleep in interrupt con (0) Darren Reed
08:30 Re: l_private (Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
07:57 Removal of recursive vnode locks (2) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
06:48 Re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (2) Antti Kantee
06:30 l_private (Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6 (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
02:56 re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (0) Paul Goyette
02:13 re: Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (2) matthew green
00:10 Enabling built-in modules earlier in init (2) Paul Goyette
Mon, 14 Jun 2010
15:26 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (3) Andrew Doran
06:00 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (1) Chuck Silvers
05:27 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (0) Chuck Silvers
Sun, 13 Jun 2010
03:41 Re: [RFC] aftermountroothook (0) Izumi Tsutsui
Fri, 11 Jun 2010
09:02 Re: preconditions of cache_enter (0) Antti Kantee
05:16 preconditions of cache_enter (1) Taylor R Campbell
Tue, 08 Jun 2010
11:34 Re: Red-black tree optimisation (0) Antti Kantee
11:25 Re: Red-black tree optimisation (1) Adam
Mon, 07 Jun 2010
18:35 Re: __read_mostly and __mp_friendly annotations (0) Matt Fleming
14:47 Re: __read_mostly and __mp_friendly annotations (1) Tim Rightnour
01:34 mbuf pool allocator can sleep in interrupt context (1) Thor Simon
01:25 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (0) David Holland
Sun, 06 Jun 2010
21:48 re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (1) matthew green
21:01 Re: __read_mostly and __mp_friendly annotations (1) Matt Fleming
17:23 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (0) der Mouse
17:16 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (1) Chuck Silvers
17:01 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (0) der Mouse
16:48 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (0) Chuck Silvers
16:45 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (1) Steven Bellovin
15:51 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (1) der Mouse
15:24 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (1) Steven Bellovin
14:52 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (0) Brian Buhrow
13:54 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
13:01 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (0) Steven Bellovin
12:24 Re: MI commpage? (0) Martin Husemann
09:03 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (2) Jordan Gordeev
08:36 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (2) Jordan Gordeev
06:15 MI commpage? (1) David Young
00:25 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
Sat, 05 Jun 2010
22:50 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
21:57 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
21:51 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (1) Bakul Shah
21:03 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (0) der Mouse
20:31 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (1) Quentin Garnier
20:01 Re: remote kernel debugging over a network (3) der Mouse
15:29 remote kernel debugging over a network (1) Jordan Gordeev
03:02 re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (1) matthew green
Fri, 04 Jun 2010
23:04 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (0) Antti Kantee
23:03 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
21:39 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support. (0) Chuck Silvers
21:34 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support. (0) Chuck Silvers
21:13 updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support (tak (4) Chuck Silvers
20:14 Re: updating COMPAT_LINUX for linux 2.6.x support. (0) Chuck Silvers
00:44 Re: Layered fs, vnode locking and v_vnlock removal (0) YAMAMOTO Takashi
Thu, 03 Jun 2010
16:07 Re: __read_mostly and __mp_friendly annotations (1) Tim Rightnour
08:12 Re: Layered fs, vnode locking and v_vnlock removal (0) David Holland
08:07 Re: Layered fs, vnode locking and v_vnlock removal (1) David Holland
07:59 Re: WAPBL and IDE mac68k (0) David Holland
05:32 Re: Layered fs, vnode locking and v_vnlock removal (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Wed, 02 Jun 2010
22:06 Re: __read_mostly and __mp_friendly annotations (1) Matt Fleming
16:57 Re: Layered fs, vnode locking and v_vnlock removal (1) David Laight
15:33 [Patch] Bootinfo root device (x86) (0) Grégoire Sutre
14:59 patch for ataraid (Re: ataraid(4) problems) (0) Hiroyuki Bessho
Tue, 01 Jun 2010
22:55 Re: Layered fs, vnode locking and v_vnlock removal (1) Adam Hamsik
15:47 Re: uvm & percpu (0) Andrew Doran
15:26 Re: uvm & percpu (1) Matthew Mondor
15:16 Re: uvm & percpu (0) Andrew Doran
14:29 Re: uvm & percpu (1) Sad Clouds
13:03 uvm & percpu (2) Antti Kantee
12:32 Re: WAPBL and IDE mac68k (1) der Mouse
09:44 Re: Layered fs, vnode locking and v_vnlock removal (2) Juergen Hannken-Illjes
05:35 WAPBL and IDE mac68k (1) John Klos
01:54 Re: Layered fs, vnode locking and v_vnlock removal (1) David Holland


Page 1 of 2010/06
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home


Mail converted by MHonArc