tech-kern by date

Last updated: Sun Aug 04 15:53:06 2013
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 2 of 2008/11
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]

TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Sun, 30 Nov 2008
21:01 Re: Scsipi guru needed... (1) Michael L. Hitch
20:58 Re: Scsipi guru needed... (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
20:53 Re: Scsipi guru needed... (0) Anders Magnusson
20:51 Re: Scsipi guru needed... (2) Anders Magnusson
19:16 Re: Scsipi guru needed... (1) Manuel Bouyer
18:58 Re: Equivalent of the system call sendfile (0) Matthias Scheler
18:41 Scsipi guru needed... (2) Anders Magnusson
11:03 Re: Atheros HAL opensourced (1) Arnaud Lacombe
06:10 Re: Atheros HAL opensourced (1) Quentin Garnier
05:57 Atheros HAL opensourced (1) Arnaud Lacombe
00:46 Re: Fixing tap(4) behaviour (0) Christos Zoulas
Sat, 29 Nov 2008
21:41 Re: Fixing tap(4) behaviour (2) Quentin Garnier
20:55 Re: Fixing tap(4) behaviour (1) Arnaud Lacombe
20:37 Re: Fixing tap(4) behaviour (0) Manuel Bouyer
20:21 Re: Fixing tap(4) behaviour (2) Quentin Garnier
20:11 Fixing tap(4) behaviour (1) Arnaud Lacombe
20:10 Re: Module problem on amd64 (fwd) (0) Paul Goyette
19:34 Re: Module problem on amd64 (fwd) (1) Paul Goyette
18:55 Re: Module problem on amd64 (fwd) (1) der Mouse
02:25 Re: Module problem on amd64 (fwd) (1) Paul Goyette
Fri, 28 Nov 2008
15:57 Re: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: unreco (1) Greg Oster
15:22 Re: replacing a soon-to-fail RAID component on the (0) der Mouse
14:20 Re: virtual kernels, syscall routing, etc. (0) Antti Kantee
13:50 Re: virtual kernels, syscall routing, etc. (1) Andrew Doran
12:00 Re: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: unreco (1) Andrew Doran
11:45 Re: virtual kernels, syscall routing, etc. (1) Andrew Doran
11:28 Re: virtual kernels, syscall routing, etc. (1) Antti Kantee
11:18 replacing a soon-to-fail RAID component on the fly (1) Edgar Fuß
11:16 Re: saving RAIDframe parity accross a panic (0) Edgar Fuß
Thu, 27 Nov 2008
18:32 virtual kernels, syscall routing, etc. (2) Antti Kantee
17:24 Re: saving RAIDframe parity accross a panic (1) der Mouse
17:19 Re: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: unreco (1) Greg Oster
17:12 Re: saving RAIDframe parity accross a panic (2) Greg Oster
16:56 Re: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: unreco (1) Edgar Fuß
16:49 Re: saving RAIDframe parity accross a panic (1) Edgar Fuß
Wed, 26 Nov 2008
15:26 re(4) patch curing livelocks (0) Dennis den Brok
01:40 Re: Equivalent of the system call sendfile (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
Tue, 25 Nov 2008
23:58 Re: Equivalent of the system call sendfile (1) David Laight
19:43 Re: Equivalent of the system call sendfile (1) Wouter Klouwen
18:26 Using modules for non-i386 GENERIC kernels (0) Paul Goyette
18:26 Re: Equivalent of the system call sendfile (1) kamel derouiche
17:56 Re: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: unreco (0) Greg Oster
16:54 Re: saving RAIDframe parity accross a panic (0) Greg Oster
16:42 Re: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: unreco (1) Brian Buhrow
16:14 Re: saving RAIDframe parity accross a panic (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
16:01 Re: saving RAIDframe parity accross a panic (2) Geert Hendrickx
15:54 Re: Equivalent of the system call sendfile (0) kamel derouiche
15:25 Re: saving RAIDframe parity accross a panic (1) Greg Oster
15:03 Re: saving RAIDframe parity accross a panic (1) Edgar Fuß
15:03 Re: sigaction(2) broken in -current (0) Matthias Drochner
14:48 Re: saving RAIDframe parity accross a panic (2) Greg Oster
13:26 Re: sigaction(2) broken in -current (1) Andrew Doran
13:20 Re: sigaction(2) broken in -current (0) Mikko Rapeli
12:47 sigaction(2) broken in -current (2) Matthias Drochner
11:45 Re: Analyzing a 4.0/amd64 panic (0) Edgar Fuß
11:41 Re: Analyzing a 4.0/amd64 panic (0) Edgar Fuß
11:20 Re: Analyzing a 4.0/amd64 panic (1) Andrew Doran
11:14 Re: Equivalent of the system call sendfile (1) Ignatios Souvatzis
11:11 Re: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: unreco (0) Edgar Fuß
10:59 Re: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: unreco (1) Andrew Doran
10:54 Re: Equivalent of the system call sendfile (1) Wouter Klouwen
08:48 Re: CVS commit: src/sys/kern (0) Antti Kantee
08:44 Re: Equivalent of the system call sendfile (0) David Huang
08:30 Re: Equivalent of the system call sendfile (3) Ignatios Souvatzis
00:12 Equivalent of the system call sendfile (1) kamel derouiche
Mon, 24 Nov 2008
23:51 Re: Analyzing a 4.0/amd64 panic (1) Edgar Fuß
23:21 saving RAIDframe parity accross a panic (1) Edgar Fuß
22:42 Re: Analyzing a 4.0/amd64 panic (1) David Laight
22:13 Re: panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: unreco (0) Greg Oster
21:52 panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: unrecovere (4) Edgar Fuß
19:39 Re: Analyzing a 4.0/amd64 panic (1) David Laight
19:26 Re: RFC: NUMA support (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
18:47 Re: RFC: NUMA support (1) David Young
18:36 Re: dynamic vs. static (was: Path to kmods) (0) Greg A. Woods; Planix, Inc.
16:25 Analyzing a 4.0/amd64 panic (2) Edgar Fuß
Sun, 23 Nov 2008
18:02 Re: Path to kmods (0) Christos Zoulas
14:21 Re: Path to kmods (0) Adam Hoka
09:59 Re: patch to support >16 bit g/uids on ext2fs (0) Izumi Tsutsui
07:33 re: patch to support >16 bit g/uids on ext2fs (1) matthew green
05:54 Re: Path to kmods (1) Izumi Tsutsui
05:10 Re: Path to kmods (3) der Mouse
04:38 Re: patch to support >16 bit g/uids on ext2fs (1) Izumi Tsutsui
04:26 Re: Path to kmods (0) Alistair Crooks
04:16 Re: Path to kmods (0) der Mouse
04:11 re: patch to support >16 bit g/uids on ext2fs (1) matthew green
03:01 Re: Path to kmods (1) Izumi Tsutsui
02:30 a small cgd(4) hiccup? (0) Nino Dehne
Sat, 22 Nov 2008
23:23 Re: Path to kmods (0) Hubert Feyrer
22:55 Re: Path to kmods (0) Matt Thomas
22:46 Re: Path to kmods (1) der Mouse
22:37 Re: Path to kmods (1) der Mouse
22:34 re: Path to kmods (1) matthew green
22:33 re: Path to kmods (1) matthew green
22:26 Re: Path to kmods (2) der Mouse
22:08 re: Path to kmods (3) matthew green
21:57 Re: Path to kmods (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
21:51 Re: Path to kmods (1) Adam Hamsik
21:00 Re: Path to kmods (3) Martin S. Weber
19:44 Re: Path to kmods (1) Arnaud Lacombe
18:45 Re: Path to kmods (2) der Mouse
06:53 Re: patch to support >16 bit g/uids on ext2fs (1) Izumi Tsutsui
05:35 re: patch to support >16 bit g/uids on ext2fs (1) matthew green
03:11 Re: patch to support >16 bit g/uids on ext2fs (1) Izumi Tsutsui
Fri, 21 Nov 2008
22:40 Re: locking/synchronization changes 4.99.66->now? (0) Andrew Doran
22:39 patch to support >16 bit g/uids on ext2fs (1) matthew green
22:35 Re: RFC: NUMA support (1) Andrew Doran
22:35 Re: -current panic on amd64 (0) Andrew Doran
22:34 re: Path to kmods (1) matthew green
22:33 Re: Path to kmods (1) der Mouse
22:10 Re: would a mutex_wait be useful? (0) Andrew Doran
22:06 Re: Path to kmods (0) Andrew Doran
22:05 Re: Path to kmods (1) Andrew Doran
21:52 Re: ksyms_init considered too heavyweight for earl (0) Martin Husemann
21:34 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (0) Andrew Doran
21:14 Re: ksyms_init considered too heavyweight for earl (1) Martin Husemann
21:11 re: ksyms_init considered too heavyweight for earl (1) matthew green
21:05 Re: ksyms_init considered too heavyweight for earl (0) Martin Husemann
21:01 Re: ksyms_init considered too heavyweight for earl (1) Andrew Doran
20:11 Changes for the WAPBL replay format (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
19:35 Re: partitioning >2TB? (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
17:57 Re: partitioning >2TB? (0) Greg Oster
17:49 Re: partitioning >2TB? (2) der Mouse
15:56 Re: Lockups and other trouble using large disks, r (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
12:25 Re: ksyms_init considered too heavyweight for earl (2) Martin Husemann
11:25 Re: Uninitialized var in altq_subr.c (0) Izumi Tsutsui
10:05 Re: Lockups and other trouble using large disks, r (0) Nino Dehne
09:48 Re: Lockups and other trouble using large disks, r (1) Manuel Bouyer
03:24 Re: Lockups and other trouble using large disks, r (1) Nino Dehne
03:13 Re: Lockups and other trouble using large disks, r (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
00:12 Lockups and other trouble using large disks, raid( (2) Nino Dehne
00:02 Re: partitioning >2TB? (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
Thu, 20 Nov 2008
23:44 Re: partitioning >2TB? (1) der Mouse
21:18 Re: partitioning >2TB? (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
21:05 Re: partitioning >2TB? (1) der Mouse
18:22 Re: partitioning >2TB? (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
18:08 partitioning >2TB? (1) der Mouse
12:44 Re: Is this assertion still correct? (0) Andrew Doran
11:29 Re: Kernel Single-user Memory usage breakdown resu (0) Juha Keski-Saari
11:24 Is this assertion still correct? (1) Reinoud Zandijk
Wed, 19 Nov 2008
20:53 Re: interrupt storm on int19 (0) Geert Hendrickx
20:27 Re: interrupt storm on int19 (1) Daniel Carosone
16:03 Re: ksyms_init considered too heavyweight for earl (1) Martin Husemann
08:48 RE: Kernel Single-user Memory usage breakdown resu (1) Juha Keski-Saari
04:18 Re: Reducing AES tables spaces (0) Arnaud Lacombe
02:59 Re: Reducing AES tables spaces (0) der Mouse
02:37 Re: Reducing AES tables spaces (2) Matt Thomas
Tue, 18 Nov 2008
22:16 "Monitoring" proplib's memory consumption (0) Arnaud Lacombe
22:06 Reducing AES tables spaces (1) Arnaud Lacombe
22:03 Re: Kernel Single-user Memory usage breakdown resu (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
18:41 Re: TP4 over IP and EON support to be removed in - (0) Christos Zoulas
13:53 Re: interrupt storm on int19 (0) Geert Hendrickx
12:12 Kernel Single-user Memory usage breakdown results (1) Juha Keski-Saari
Mon, 17 Nov 2008
21:19 Re: amd64 panics w/XEN_DOM0, not GENERIC (0) Manuel Bouyer
20:27 Re: TP4 over IP and EON support to be removed in - (1) Robert Elz
18:05 Re: interface detach/destroy hook? (0) der Mouse
16:10 Re: TP4 over IP and EON support to be removed in - (0) Johnny Billquist
15:48 Re: TP4 over IP and EON support to be removed in - (1) Ignatios Souvatzis
15:00 Re: Lastest WAPBL update destroys the root partiti (0) Michael
14:53 Re: Lastest WAPBL update destroys the root partiti (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
14:43 Re: TP4 over IP and EON support to be removed in - (2) Antti Kantee
14:22 Re: amd64 panics w/XEN_DOM0, not GENERIC (1) Todd Kover
14:05 Re: Using qsort(3) in the kernel (0) Johnny Billquist
13:59 Re: ksyms_init considered too heavyweight for earl (0) Michael
13:55 Re: Lastest WAPBL update destroys the root partiti (1) Michael
13:53 Re: Using qsort(3) in the kernel (1) Matt Thomas
13:23 Re: TP4 over IP and EON support to be removed in - (1) Nick Hudson
12:44 Re: ksyms_init considered too heavyweight for earl (0) Andrew Doran
12:39 Re: Using qsort(3) in the kernel (was: CVS commit: (0) Andrew Doran
12:34 Re: options RND_COM considered dangeous (0) Andrew Doran
11:40 Re: TP4 over IP and EON support to be removed in - (1) Ignatios Souvatzis
11:08 Re: interface detach/destroy hook? (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
10:30 ksyms_init considered too heavyweight for early bo (3) Martin Husemann
10:13 Re: Using qsort(3) in the kernel (1) Johnny Billquist
09:34 Re: interface detach/destroy hook? (1) Martin Husemann
09:20 Re: Using qsort(3) in the kernel (0) Ignatios Souvatzis
08:00 Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework (1) Alexander Shishkin
07:00 Re: Using qsort(3) in the kernel (1) Andrew Reilly
06:07 Re: interface detach/destroy hook? (2) der Mouse
05:47 Re: interface detach/destroy hook? (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
05:24 interface detach/destroy hook? (1) der Mouse
02:32 Re: Using qsort(3) in the kernel (1) Matt Thomas


Page 2 of 2008/11
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home


Mail converted by MHonArc