[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: saving RAIDframe parity accross a panic
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 05:01:33PM +0100, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:48:51AM -0600, Greg Oster wrote:
> > There are plans to make it not have to check as much parity
> > after a panic, but right now it has to verify all parity...
> For when is this planned?
You too have a text editor! (Probably even one with convenient
macros for doing things like indenting source code.)
The parity logging code, if it could be quickly made to work at all
(I keep meaning to find the time to try, but my text editor is...busy),
appears to have most of the functionality required for this already.
Specifically, it chops up the disk into many parity regions and tracks
their state independently of each other.
I have no idea if this code would work in a 2-disk "mirror" setup
like many of us use to boot NetBSD. I suspect that would require
some support in the bootblocks, just as a 2-disk "RAID5" doesn't work
Thor Lancelot Simon
"Even experienced UNIX users occasionally enter rm *.* at the UNIX
prompt only to realize too late that they have removed the wrong
segment of the directory structure." - Microsoft WSS whitepaper
Main Index |
Thread Index |