tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Path to kmods

> please give real examples where these things have happened where
> backwards compat was not provided for featurse you care about _on
> purpose_.

The first example that comes to mind?  In 2.0, 1.x executables that
depended on executing out of the stack broke.  On purpose.

Or, at least, non-executable stack was on purpose; it's possible that
the failure to provide backward compatability was a result of someone
not thinking of something rather than conscious choice.  Certainly
nobody seemed too concerned about the lack of compatability when I
tracked it down, though.

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML      
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index