[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: rfc: high-resolution timer framework
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 03:47:56PM +0000, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 12:10:28PM +0000, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> > > Any concerns on this patch?
> > Hooking this into timecounters is a completely wrong abstraction.
> > I'm fine with the userland side, but the kernel internals are simply
> > wrong.
> It seems we agree that a long-term solution would be basing everything on
> callouts, however this code could still be a short-term solution.
> Can we come up with some conclusion?
I think this is something that we really want to have, but the functionality
should be provided through / merged with callouts instead of inventing
another API to exist in parallel. There are too many similarities.
Main Index |
Thread Index |