tech-kern by date

Last updated: Sun Aug 04 15:53:07 2013
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 1 of 2009/06
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]

TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Fri, 26 Jun 2009
22:06 NetBSD-5 ichlpcib watchdog timer seems to be broke (2) Brian Buhrow
20:25 Re: accept_filter, accf_http, setsockopt and the E (1) Thor Lancelot Simon
20:07 Re: accept_filter, accf_http, setsockopt and the E (1) Sverre Froyen
18:54 re: netbsd-5 build failure in 1915drm (0) matthew green
18:37 netbsd-5 build failure in 1915drm (1) Stathis Kamperis
Thu, 25 Jun 2009
15:58 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (0) David Young
08:28 Re: accept_filter, accf_http, setsockopt and the E (1) Iain Hibbert
07:18 Another reason to register and attend Kernel Confe (0) James C. McPherson
00:04 Re: UVM emap implementation (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Wed, 24 Jun 2009
19:04 accept_filter, accf_http, setsockopt and the EINVA (1) Sverre Froyen
15:14 Re: Splitting <fs>_access to two internal routines (0) Elad Efrat
09:38 Re: Splitting <fs>_access to two internal routines (0) Elad Efrat
06:43 Re: Splitting <fs>_access to two internal routines (1) David Laight
00:36 Re: Splitting <fs>_access to two internal routines (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
Tue, 23 Jun 2009
22:13 Re: Splitting <fs>_access to two internal routines (2) Elad Efrat
18:38 Re: Eliminating closed source? (0) Tonnerre LOMBARD
16:10 Re: Eliminating closed source? (0) der Mouse
15:38 Re: Eliminating closed source? (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
15:29 Re: Eliminating closed source? (1) der Mouse
14:38 Re: Eliminating closed source? (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
14:37 Re: elantech improvement. (0) Christos Zoulas
13:26 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (0) Brett Lymn
04:20 Eliminating closed source? (1) der Mouse
Mon, 22 Jun 2009
22:11 elantech improvement. (0) Xaionaro
22:11 elantech improvement. (1) Xaionaro
22:10 elantech improvement. (0) Xaionaro
20:35 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (0) Greg A. Woods
17:19 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) der Mouse
17:07 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (2) Greg A. Woods
16:38 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) Greg A. Woods
10:27 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) Matthew Mondor
01:09 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) der Mouse
Sun, 21 Jun 2009
21:51 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (2) Greg A. Woods
21:11 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (0) Greg A. Woods
21:02 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) der Mouse
20:33 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) Greg A. Woods
17:32 Re: more on the "vmmapva" kernel deadlocks on NetB (1) Greg A. Woods
16:37 Splitting <fs>_access to two internal routines (2) Elad Efrat
15:11 vaccess -> genfs_can_access (0) Elad Efrat
02:01 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (3) der Mouse
Sat, 20 Jun 2009
20:44 Re: lockdebug panic when running fsck_ffs (0) Sverre Froyen
19:09 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) Iain Hibbert
17:23 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) David Holland
17:02 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) David Holland
16:00 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (0) Matthew Mondor
15:51 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (0) Hans Petter Selasky
11:49 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (2) der Mouse
10:05 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) tlaronde
10:03 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (2) Iain Hibbert
05:21 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (2) David Holland
05:05 re: Updated drm code (0) matthew green
00:15 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) Matthew Mondor
Fri, 19 Jun 2009
19:04 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) David Holland
18:57 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) Greg A. Woods
18:21 Re: UVM typedef struct (2) David Holland
17:59 Re: more on the "vmmapva" kernel deadlocks on NetB (0) Greg A. Woods
17:51 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) Greg A. Woods
17:18 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) David Holland
17:07 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) Hans Petter Selasky
16:58 re: Updated drm code (0) matthew green
16:35 Re: more on the "vmmapva" kernel deadlocks on NetB (2) Greg A. Woods
16:06 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) Greg A. Woods
11:47 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (0) Matt Fleming
08:46 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (2) Iain Hibbert
07:21 Re: Updated drm code (1) Martin Husemann
06:13 re: Updated drm code (2) matthew green
05:57 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (2) Alistair Crooks
Thu, 18 Jun 2009
20:23 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) Antti Kantee
18:10 Re: more on the "vmmapva" kernel deadlocks on NetB (1) der Mouse
09:54 more on the "vmmapva" kernel deadlocks on NetBSD-4 (1) Greg A. Woods
00:39 wiring down device attachments (was: pcictl: simpl (0) Greg A. Woods
Wed, 17 Jun 2009
23:23 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) Terry Moore
22:15 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) James Chacon
22:07 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) Terry Moore
14:26 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) Adam Hamsik
14:16 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) Hubert Feyrer
11:05 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) Reinoud Zandijk
11:01 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) Reinoud Zandijk
10:14 iodone not being called (0) Jan Danielsson
06:47 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) David Laight
06:02 re: UVM typedef struct (1) matthew green
04:48 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) Eric Haszlakiewicz
00:28 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) Masao Uebayashi
00:04 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) der Mouse
Tue, 16 Jun 2009
23:49 Re: vge VT6130 driver help (0) Toru Nishimura
23:21 Re: UVM typedef struct (3) Antti Kantee
21:38 Re: lockdebug panic when running fsck_ffs (1) Tonnerre LOMBARD
20:14 re: UVM typedef struct (1) matthew green
20:00 Re: UVM typedef struct (2) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
19:58 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (0) Matthew Mondor
19:50 vge VT6130 driver help (0) Aran Clauson
19:46 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (0) Hans Petter Selasky
19:31 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (2) Antti Kantee
19:24 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) Arnaud Lacombe
19:11 Re: FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (1) Antti Kantee
19:02 Re: UVM typedef struct (2) Antti Kantee
15:50 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) David Laight
15:16 re: UVM typedef struct (1) matthew green
14:55 Re: UVM typedef struct (3) Eric Haszlakiewicz
09:19 Re: UVM typedef struct (2) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
05:45 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) Peter Seebach
05:37 Re: UVM typedef struct (2) Antti Kantee
05:31 Re: UVM typedef struct (2) Masao Uebayashi
Mon, 15 Jun 2009
21:42 Proposed changes to acpi_tz sensor behavior (0) Paul Goyette
19:16 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) der Mouse
19:10 UVM typedef struct (4) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
19:05 UVM emap implementation (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
13:45 sendmsg/recvmsg not failing with msg_iovlen value (0) Nicolas Joly
Sun, 14 Jun 2009
21:32 FreeBSD devfs support on NetBSD 5.0 (2) Hans Petter Selasky
10:22 Re: fix LOCKDEBUG crash in vfs (0) Tonnerre LOMBARD
08:13 fix LOCKDEBUG crash in vfs (1) Christoph Egger
Sat, 13 Jun 2009
10:50 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Manuel Bouyer
09:56 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
01:41 UVM aobj pager vs uvm_swap (0) Luis Useche
Fri, 12 Jun 2009
14:28 Re: Kern/41566, Problem with pty(4) handling under (0) Brian Buhrow
09:26 Re: Kern/41566, Problem with pty(4) handling under (0) Iain Hibbert
Thu, 11 Jun 2009
20:15 Re: Kern/41566, Problem with pty(4) handling under (1) Brian Buhrow
19:06 Re: Kern/41566, Problem with pty(4) handling under (0) Iain Hibbert
18:44 Re: Kern/41566, Problem with pty(4) handling under (0) Zafer Aydoğan
17:49 Re: Kern/41566, Problem with pty(4) handling under (1) Brian Buhrow
15:33 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) David Young
15:11 re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) matthew green
09:27 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
09:17 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) Christoph Egger
Wed, 10 Jun 2009
21:49 Re: lockdebug panic when running fsck_ffs (1) Patrick Welche
19:44 lockdebug panic when running fsck_ffs (1) Tonnerre LOMBARD
12:44 Kern/41566, Problem with pty(4) handling under Net (1) Brian Buhrow
08:09 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Alan Barrett
05:19 Only _3_ days left for earlybird registration to K (0) James C. McPherson
01:23 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Greg A. Woods
Tue, 09 Jun 2009
20:02 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Quentin Garnier
19:47 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Greg A. Woods
17:05 Re: Interrupt handlers in NetBSD 5.0 (0) David Laight
15:18 Re: NFS (0) Reinoud Zandijk
14:38 Re: Interrupt handlers in NetBSD 5.0 (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
13:50 Re: Interrupt handlers in NetBSD 5.0 (1) Hans Petter Selasky
13:47 Re: Interrupt handlers in NetBSD 5.0 (1) Hans Petter Selasky
13:15 Re: Interrupt handlers in NetBSD 5.0 (0) der Mouse
12:25 Re: Interrupt handlers in NetBSD 5.0 (2) Joerg Sonnenberger
12:24 Re: Interrupt handlers in NetBSD 5.0 (1) der Mouse
11:52 Re: Interrupt handlers in NetBSD 5.0 (2) Hans Petter Selasky
10:17 Re: radio0 at bktr0 (0) Jukka Marin
08:52 Re: Interrupt handlers in NetBSD 5.0 (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
08:41 Re: Interrupt handlers in NetBSD 5.0 (1) Hans Petter Selasky
Mon, 08 Jun 2009
21:46 Re: Interrupt handlers in NetBSD 5.0 (1) Andrew Doran
20:33 Re: Interrupt handlers in NetBSD 5.0 (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
20:20 Interrupt handlers in NetBSD 5.0 (1) Hans Petter Selasky
01:14 Re: CVS commit: src/external/gpl2/lvm2/dist/libdm/ (0) YAMAMOTO Takashi
Sun, 07 Jun 2009
11:36 Re: Unifying /dev/{mem,kmem,zero,null} implementat (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
10:50 options MODULAR improvements phase 1.5 (0) John Nemeth
Sat, 06 Jun 2009
09:12 Re: Problem with pty(4) handling under NetBSD-5, w (0) Iain Hibbert
Fri, 05 Jun 2009
22:24 Problem with pty(4) handling under NetBSD-5, was: (1) Brian Buhrow
02:46 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) der Mouse
Thu, 04 Jun 2009
23:35 Re: Problem with pckbc(4) under NetBSD-5 (0) Brian Buhrow
23:27 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Matthias Drochner
22:28 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Michael
21:43 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) Manuel Bouyer
21:05 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
20:41 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
20:29 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
20:22 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
20:17 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
20:08 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Christoph Egger
18:54 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) Joerg Sonnenberger
18:08 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
18:02 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
18:00 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
17:19 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) Matthias Drochner
17:05 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) der Mouse
16:59 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Thor Lancelot Simon
16:13 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
16:04 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
15:58 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Magnus Eriksson
15:50 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
13:36 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
13:28 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
11:28 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
11:02 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Manuel Bouyer
10:38 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (2) Christoph Egger
10:20 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
10:15 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
10:11 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Christoph Egger
09:48 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Manuel Bouyer
07:06 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (0) Christoph Egger
06:13 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Matthew Mondor
05:45 Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (1) Christoph Egger
Wed, 03 Jun 2009
23:15 Re: options MODULAR improvements phase 1.0 (0) John Nemeth
22:18 Re: options MODULAR improvements phase 1.0 (1) Matthew Mondor
21:29 [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage (3) Christoph Egger
19:00 Re: Strange amd64 double panic (0) Manuel Bouyer
18:44 Strange amd64 double panic (1) John Klos
16:28 Re: NetBSD 5 STABLE wm0 panic (1) Chris Ross
13:34 Re: NetBSD 5 STABLE wm0 panic (1) Manuel Bouyer
06:51 Re: NFS (0) David Holland
06:16 Re: disappointing upgrade to NetBSD 5.0 (0) Dan Engholm
01:49 options MODULAR improvements phase 1.0 (1) John Nemeth
Tue, 02 Jun 2009
13:59 Re: NFS (0) Michai Ramakers
13:48 Re: NFS (1) Jukka Marin
11:24 Re: NFS (1) Martin Husemann
11:10 NFS (4) Jukka Marin


Page 1 of 2009/06
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home


Mail converted by MHonArc