tech-kern by date

Last updated: Sun Aug 04 15:53:07 2013
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 2 of 2009/08
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]

TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Sun, 30 Aug 2009
16:41 Re: uarea swap-out (1) David Laight
14:08 Re: tstile syndrome (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
14:06 Re: tstile syndrome (3) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
09:12 Re: tstile syndrome (0) Manuel Bouyer
08:17 Re: tstile syndrome (1) David Holland
08:15 Re: tstile syndrome (1) David Holland
Sat, 29 Aug 2009
22:57 Re: NFS experts: stale vnode pointer in ufs_fhtovp (1) David Holland
22:05 NFS experts: stale vnode pointer in ufs_fhtovp ? (1) Manuel Bouyer
14:45 Re: uarea swap-out (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
10:11 Re: kern/41923: assertion "cur != owner" failed (0) Andrew Doran
10:05 Re: tstile syndrome (0) Manuel Bouyer
10:04 Re: tstile syndrome (0) Manuel Bouyer
10:02 Re: tstile syndrome (1) Andrew Doran
09:56 Re: tstile syndrome (2) Andrew Doran
09:49 Re: uarea swap-out (1) Andrew Doran
07:38 Re: Reclaiming vnodes (0) Adam Hamsik
Fri, 28 Aug 2009
21:59 Re: uarea swap-out (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
19:59 Re: Vnode scope implementation (0) Elad Efrat
17:08 Re: merge for gt(4) and Marvell SoC (0) FUKAUMI Naoki
Thu, 27 Aug 2009
20:00 Re: kern/41923: assertion "cur != owner" failed (1) Manuel Bouyer
13:00 Re: tstile syndrome (2) Manuel Bouyer
11:53 Re: tstile syndrome (0) Manuel Bouyer
11:09 tstile syndrome (3) Manuel Bouyer
00:21 Re: kern/41923: assertion "cur != owner" failed (0) Manuel Bouyer
Wed, 26 Aug 2009
23:05 Re: kern/41923: assertion "cur != owner" failed (2) Manuel Bouyer
22:56 Re: CVS commit: src (0) Elad Efrat
21:05 Re: CVS commit: src (1) David Holland
20:21 Re: CVS commit: src (1) Elad Efrat
20:07 Re: CVS commit: src (1) David Holland
12:29 Re: NFS hangs (again) (0) Christos Zoulas
00:13 Re: NFS hangs (again) (1) Brian Marcotte
Tue, 25 Aug 2009
22:10 Re: NFS hangs (again) (0) Manuel Bouyer
21:13 Re: NFS hangs (again) (1) Christos Zoulas
20:19 Re: Vnode scope implementation (1) Marc Balmer
20:18 Re: Vnode scope implementation (0) Elad Efrat
20:09 Re: NFS hangs (again) (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
20:04 Re: uarea swap-out (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
20:00 Re: Vnode scope implementation (2) YAMAMOTO Takashi
18:08 Re: NFS hangs (again) (1) Christos Zoulas
18:07 Re: NFS hangs (again) (1) Christos Zoulas
18:06 Re: Vnode scope implementation (1) Elad Efrat
17:34 Re: NFS hangs (again) (1) Izumi Tsutsui
17:18 Re: NFS hangs (again) (1) Brian Marcotte
15:44 Re: Reclaiming vnodes (3) YAMAMOTO Takashi
15:43 Re: Vnode scope implementation (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
14:31 Re: NFS hangs (again) (1) Christos Zoulas
12:58 Re: merge for gt(4) and Marvell SoC (1) KIYOHARA Takashi
01:34 Re: NFS hangs (again) (1) Brian Marcotte
Mon, 24 Aug 2009
23:41 kern/41923: assertion "cur != owner" failed (1) Manuel Bouyer
23:15 Re: NFS hangs (again) (0) Brian Marcotte
20:12 Re: uarea swap-out (1) Mike Pumford
19:32 NFS hangs (again) (0) Brian Marcotte
17:14 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (0) Manuel Bouyer
15:22 mount hang attempting to mount a umass device (0) Jeremy C. Reed
13:04 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) Simon Burge
12:31 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (0) Manuel Bouyer
12:27 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) Christoph Egger
11:47 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) Manuel Bouyer
10:54 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) Christoph Egger
09:58 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) Manuel Bouyer
09:48 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) Christoph Egger
09:05 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) Manuel Bouyer
05:10 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) Christoph Egger
Sun, 23 Aug 2009
22:35 re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) matthew green
22:14 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (0) Manuel Bouyer
22:03 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) Manuel Bouyer
21:39 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) Christoph Egger
20:30 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (0) Martin Husemann
20:23 re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (2) matthew green
20:19 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (0) Manuel Bouyer
20:08 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) Martin Husemann
20:01 re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) matthew green
19:57 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (2) Michael
19:49 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (2) Manuel Bouyer
19:06 re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (2) matthew green
18:31 Re: Vnode scope implementation (1) Elad Efrat
15:15 Re: Vnode scope implementation (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
09:51 Re: basic support for (software concept) "pci doma (1) Martin Husemann
09:37 basic support for (software concept) "pci domains" (1) matthew green
Sat, 22 Aug 2009
14:26 Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processe (0) Christos Zoulas
12:23 Re: uarea swap-out (2) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
11:29 Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processe (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
08:25 Re: proposed sysctl(9) changes (0) David Laight
Fri, 21 Aug 2009
22:44 Re: proposed sysctl(9) changes (0) Paul Goyette
22:35 proposed sysctl(9) changes (2) David Young
15:19 Re: Vnode scope implementation (1) Elad Efrat
11:34 Re: Vnode scope implementation (1) Marc Balmer
10:32 Re: Vnode scope implementation (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
10:27 Re: Vnode scope implementation (1) Marc Balmer
10:19 Re: Vnode scope implementation (1) YAMAMOTO Takashi
06:02 Re: merge for gt(4) and Marvell SoC (1) KIYOHARA Takashi
01:52 Re: Vnode scope implementation (1) Elad Efrat
Thu, 20 Aug 2009
20:46 Re: merge for gt(4) and Marvell SoC (1) Robert Swindells
17:23 Re: clearing bogus journal (0) Manuel Bouyer
17:21 Re: clearing bogus journal (0) Manuel Bouyer
06:06 Re: uarea swap-out (0) David Holland
06:05 Re: Reclaiming vnodes (0) David Holland
Wed, 19 Aug 2009
20:22 Listing of small businesses for the United States (0) Ilene Fowler
13:00 Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processe (1) Christos Zoulas
Tue, 18 Aug 2009
21:26 re: uarea swap-out (1) matthew green
21:10 Re: uarea swap-out (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
20:57 Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processe (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
14:11 Re: clearing bogus journal (0) Manuel Bouyer
13:12 Re: clearing bogus journal (1) Izumi Tsutsui
12:57 Re: clearing bogus journal (1) Manuel Bouyer
12:44 Re: clearing bogus journal (1) Izumi Tsutsui
12:20 Re: clearing bogus journal (1) Manuel Bouyer
12:20 Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processe (1) Christos Zoulas
12:15 Re: clearing bogus journal (1) Izumi Tsutsui
Mon, 17 Aug 2009
21:52 clearing bogus journal (4) Manuel Bouyer
21:35 Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processe (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
21:15 Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? (0) Marc Balmer
21:08 Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? (1) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
20:15 Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) (0) Marc Balmer
19:46 Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) (1) David Young
19:34 Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) (1) Marc Balmer
19:30 Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) (1) David Young
19:30 Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) (0) Marc Balmer
19:29 Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
19:26 Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) (2) David Young
19:25 Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) (1) Marc Balmer
19:20 Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? (0) Anders Magnusson
19:09 re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? (2) matthew green
19:07 Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) (1) Joerg Sonnenberger
18:58 Re: Reclaiming vnodes (0) Adam Hamsik
18:57 Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) (2) David Young
17:32 Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? (0) Marc Balmer
17:29 Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? (1) Matt Thomas
17:19 Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? (1) Marc Balmer
17:14 Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? (0) der Mouse
16:58 Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? (2) Matt Thomas
16:52 Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? (0) Marc Balmer
16:49 Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? (2) Thor Lancelot Simon
16:46 Re: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? (1) Marc Balmer
16:39 should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys? (2) Marc Balmer
15:16 possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processes ca (1) Christos Zoulas
14:10 Re: Solved! (was: why is this needed?) (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
14:04 Solved! (was: why is this needed?) (2) Marc Balmer
13:16 Re: Reclaiming vnodes (1) Martin Husemann
12:58 why is this needed? (1) Marc Balmer
12:49 Re: Interrupt problem on Sony Vaio BZ11XN (0) Ignatios Souvatzis
12:18 Re: Reclaiming vnodes (2) Adam Hamsik
11:44 Re: assertion "solocked(sb->sb_so)" failed [Re: di (0) Manuel Bouyer
11:00 Re: Reclaiming vnodes (1) Martin Husemann
09:45 Reclaiming vnodes (2) Adam Hamsik
03:48 Re: uarea swap-out (1) der Mouse
03:33 Re: uarea swap-out (0) Matt Thomas
03:19 re: uarea swap-out (1) matthew green
02:54 Re: uarea swap-out (1) Matt Thomas
02:42 DIOCGDISKINFO for dk(4) (0) jakllsch
01:42 Re: uarea swap-out (1) der Mouse
01:16 Re: uarea swap-out (3) Matt Thomas
00:55 Re: uarea swap-out (0) Matt Thomas
00:27 Re: uarea swap-out (1) der Mouse
00:07 uarea swap-out (3) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Sun, 16 Aug 2009
22:19 Re: assertion "solocked(sb->sb_so)" failed [Re: di (1) Manuel Bouyer
19:31 assertion "solocked(sb->sb_so)" failed [Re: diagno (1) Manuel Bouyer
Sat, 15 Aug 2009
12:12 Re: merge for gt(4) and Marvell SoC (0) KIYOHARA Takashi
09:42 Re: ALL kernel can not be built (0) Marc Balmer
08:44 ALL kernel can not be built (1) Marc Balmer
01:21 re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (0) matthew green
Fri, 14 Aug 2009
22:22 Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (1) Mark Davies
20:44 Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m (0) Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
20:40 NFS hangs (0) Brian Marcotte
14:06 Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m (0) Matthias Scheler
12:57 Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m (1) Marc Balmer
12:41 Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m (1) Matthias Scheler
08:46 Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m (2) Marc Balmer
Thu, 13 Aug 2009
18:57 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) Tonnerre LOMBARD
18:55 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) Tonnerre LOMBARD
07:46 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) Alan Barrett
06:19 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) Iain Hibbert
06:08 Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE (0) Jed Davis
01:39 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) James Chacon
Wed, 12 Aug 2009
22:08 Re: UVM typedef struct (2) Tonnerre LOMBARD
21:17 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) Iain Hibbert
20:33 Re: UVM typedef struct (2) Tonnerre LOMBARD
18:29 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) Eric Haszlakiewicz
16:50 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) David Holland
16:42 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) Eric Haszlakiewicz
14:53 Re: diagnostic assertion "solocked2(so, so2)" fail (1) Manuel Bouyer
13:47 Re: diagnostic assertion "solocked2(so, so2)" fail (0) Manuel Bouyer
10:39 Interrupt problem on Sony Vaio BZ11XN (1) Gilbert Fernandes
01:45 Re: kern/41874: in-kernel NFS server hates network (0) Erik Fair
01:31 Re: merge for gt(4) and Marvell SoC (2) Simon Burge
Tue, 11 Aug 2009
22:30 ZFS, ARC, and UBC (0) Jason Thorpe
18:01 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) David Holland
17:42 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) Eric Haszlakiewicz
17:16 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) Peter Seebach
16:35 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) David Holland
15:16 Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x (0) Brian Buhrow
14:18 Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re (0) Quentin Garnier
11:09 Re: diagnostic assertion "solocked2(so, so2)" fail (1) Jachym Holecek
09:09 diagnostic assertion "solocked2(so, so2)" failed (2) Manuel Bouyer
08:26 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) Peter Seebach
07:50 Re: UVM typedef struct (0) David Holland
07:49 Re: UVM typedef struct (2) der Mouse
07:48 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) David Holland
07:19 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) Matthew Mondor
07:18 Re: UVM typedef struct (1) Peter Seebach


Page 2 of 2009/08
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home


Mail converted by MHonArc