| Time | Subject | # followups | From |
| Tue, 11 Aug 2009 |
| 06:45 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(2) |
David Holland |
| 06:44 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
David Laight |
| 06:38 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
David Holland |
| 06:30 |
Re: vfs-level naming issue |
(0) |
David Holland |
| 00:48 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
Jason Thorpe |
| 00:43 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(3) |
Jason Thorpe |
| 00:41 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(1) |
Jason Thorpe |
| 00:40 |
Re: UVM typedef struct |
(0) |
Jason Thorpe |
| Mon, 10 Aug 2009 |
| 21:16 |
Re: Early console attach vs PCI_NETBSD_CONFIGURE |
(0) |
Gavan Fantom |
| 17:42 |
Re: vfs-level naming issue |
(1) |
Adam Hamsik |
| 16:08 |
vfs-level naming issue |
(1) |
David Holland |
| 15:23 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
David Young |
| 15:09 |
re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(0) |
matthew green |
| 15:02 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 14:43 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(1) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
| 14:25 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 13:34 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(0) |
Mark Davies |
| 13:25 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 13:23 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Joerg Sonnenberger |
| 13:14 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 13:08 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(3) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 12:53 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(2) |
Mark Davies |
| 10:13 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 07:48 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
| 07:41 |
Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 06:56 |
Re: what keylock(4) actually does for netbsd? |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 06:11 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| Sun, 09 Aug 2009 |
| 22:18 |
re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(1) |
matthew green |
| 21:54 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(1) |
Mark Davies |
| 21:37 |
re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(0) |
matthew green |
| 21:18 |
Re: swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(2) |
Matthew Mondor |
| 21:12 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Tonnerre LOMBARD |
| 21:05 |
re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(1) |
matthew green |
| 20:55 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 20:54 |
Re: sata tape drives? |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
| 20:53 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
| 20:53 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
| 20:48 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(2) |
David Laight |
| 20:40 |
Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 20:37 |
Re: sata tape drives? |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 20:35 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Christos Zoulas |
| 20:30 |
re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(1) |
matthew green |
| 20:28 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 20:24 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
| 20:23 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Matt Thomas |
| 20:20 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 20:17 |
re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
matthew green |
| 20:06 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
| 20:05 |
re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
matthew green |
| 20:02 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 20:00 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 19:59 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
| 19:56 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 19:50 |
re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
matthew green |
| 19:47 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(3) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 19:38 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 19:38 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(2) |
David Laight |
| 19:35 |
Re: sata tape drives? |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 19:34 |
re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
| 19:30 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
David Laight |
| 19:29 |
re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(2) |
matthew green |
| 19:14 |
Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 19:00 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 19:00 |
Re: sata tape drives? |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
| 18:56 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Matt Thomas |
| 18:55 |
sata tape drives? |
(2) |
Bernd Ernesti |
| 18:52 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 18:40 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 18:38 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
| 18:36 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Ted Lemon |
| 18:35 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 18:25 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
| 18:19 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 17:40 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Ted Lemon |
| 17:34 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Adam Hoka |
| 17:34 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 17:32 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Matt Thomas |
| 17:13 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 17:11 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Adam Hoka |
| 17:03 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
| 15:58 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
| 15:41 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
| 15:35 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(1) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
| 15:30 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
| 14:18 |
Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 14:04 |
Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging |
(1) |
Matthias Scheler |
| 13:25 |
swap space leak in 5.0_STABLE |
(2) |
Mark Davies |
| 12:55 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
| 12:45 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
| 12:22 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 12:04 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Adam Hamsik |
| 11:39 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 11:36 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(3) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 10:59 |
Re: static functions are your friends (Was GPIO re |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
| 10:14 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 10:01 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 08:28 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(2) |
Iain Hibbert |
| 03:01 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives - |
(2) |
Paul Goyette |
| Sat, 08 Aug 2009 |
| 22:45 |
Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging |
(0) |
Tonnerre LOMBARD |
| 22:44 |
Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging |
(0) |
Tonnerre LOMBARD |
| 18:28 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
| 18:23 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(0) |
Paul Goyette |
| 17:51 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(0) |
David Young |
| 17:49 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(2) |
David Young |
| 16:14 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
| 14:07 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 14:02 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
| 13:39 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 13:33 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
| 13:33 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
| 13:12 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 12:36 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 12:36 |
Re: gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging |
(3) |
Marc Balmer |
| 12:28 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(2) |
Paul Goyette |
| 12:16 |
Re: Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 12:10 |
Implement mode_select for atapi tape drives |
(1) |
Paul Goyette |
| 10:37 |
gpioiic(4), I2C bus over GPIO bit-banging |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 09:14 |
Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import |
(0) |
Pawel Jakub Dawidek |
| 07:44 |
CDDL [was: ]Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import |
(0) |
Hubert Feyrer |
| 06:26 |
Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import |
(0) |
Adam Hamsik |
| 01:28 |
Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import |
(0) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
| Fri, 07 Aug 2009 |
| 23:38 |
Re: [HEADS UP] zfs import |
(3) |
Arnaud Lacombe |
| 21:11 |
[HEADS UP] zfs import |
(2) |
Adam Hamsik |
| 18:28 |
Re: on getting rid of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER |
(0) |
Elad Efrat |
| 18:28 |
Re: RAIDframe parity logging |
(0) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
| 18:28 |
RAIDframe parity logging |
(1) |
Thor Lancelot Simon |
| 18:28 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Peter Seebach |
| 09:41 |
Lona |
(0) |
MR ALONSO FERNANDO |
| 08:14 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| Thu, 06 Aug 2009 |
| 16:06 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Peter Seebach |
| 15:54 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 15:42 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
| 15:28 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
| 14:50 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(0) |
Greg Oster |
| 14:22 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 14:17 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 13:38 |
Re: Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-m |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 10:51 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 10:47 |
Re: the __ namespace in the kernel |
(0) |
Antti Kantee |
| 10:47 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Anders Magnusson |
| 10:42 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 10:42 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Antti Kantee |
| 10:41 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
| 10:37 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 10:34 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(3) |
Matthias Drochner |
| 08:00 |
Reworked: Support for multi-position electro-mecha |
(4) |
Marc Balmer |
| 07:21 |
Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX |
(0) |
Iain Hibbert |
| 07:19 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| Wed, 05 Aug 2009 |
| 22:15 |
Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX |
(1) |
Christoph Badura |
| 06:44 |
Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX |
(0) |
David Laight |
| 06:14 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(3) |
Brian Buhrow |
| 02:55 |
Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX |
(0) |
David Holland |
| 00:28 |
Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX |
(3) |
Jason Thorpe |
| Tue, 04 Aug 2009 |
| 22:07 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(1) |
Mark Davies |
| 21:07 |
Re: [PATCH] pcictl: simplify its usage |
(1) |
Matthias Drochner |
| 17:39 |
Re: Fwd: usb driver programming |
(0) |
Iain Hibbert |
| 16:45 |
Re: Fwd: usb driver programming |
(1) |
Dmitry Cherkassov |
| 10:13 |
Re: Fwd: usb driver programming |
(1) |
Iain Hibbert |
| 09:35 |
Fwd: usb driver programming |
(1) |
Dmitry Cherkassov |
| 03:19 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
Elad Efrat |
| Mon, 03 Aug 2009 |
| 23:07 |
Re: Vnode scope implementation |
(1) |
YAMAMOTO Takashi |
| 16:04 |
Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 15:58 |
Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE |
(0) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
| 15:58 |
Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 15:37 |
Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
| 15:28 |
Re: kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE |
(1) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 14:58 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(2) |
Peter Seebach |
| 14:44 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Marc Balmer |
| 14:23 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
David Holland |
| 11:38 |
kernel_lock, splbio() and SMP_SAFE |
(2) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 03:45 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
David Holland |
| Sun, 02 Aug 2009 |
| 19:48 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 19:44 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Christoph Badura |
| 19:43 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Arnaud Lacombe |
| 19:06 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 19:03 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(2) |
Antti Kantee |
| 18:53 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(2) |
Marc Balmer |
| 18:26 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius |
| 17:46 |
Re: on getting rid of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER |
(1) |
Iain Hibbert |
| 17:23 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 16:52 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(0) |
Hubert Feyrer |
| 16:45 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Arnaud Lacombe |
| 16:35 |
Re: Support for multi-position electro-mechanical |
(1) |
Christoph Badura |
| 14:08 |
Re: roadmap for /kern |
(0) |
Tonnerre LOMBARD |
| 09:54 |
Support for multi-position electro-mechanical keyl |
(6) |
Marc Balmer |
| 08:27 |
Re: roadmap for /kern |
(0) |
Marc Balmer |
| 05:50 |
Re: roadmap for /kern |
(0) |
David Holland |
| 05:35 |
Re: roadmap for /kern |
(2) |
Matthew Mondor |
| 04:14 |
Re: roadmap for /kern |
(1) |
Arnaud Lacombe |
| 02:09 |
roadmap for /kern |
(2) |
matthew sporleder |
| Sat, 01 Aug 2009 |
| 23:31 |
Re: Problems with hangs under NetBSD-5.x |
(1) |
Matthew Mondor |
| 23:05 |
Re: Early console attach vs PCI_NETBSD_CONFIGURE |
(1) |
Michael |
| 20:10 |
Early console attach vs PCI_NETBSD_CONFIGURE |
(1) |
Gavan Fantom |
| 17:27 |
Re: factoring out the change_root() and making exp |
(0) |
David Holland |
| 15:05 |
Re: on getting rid of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER |
(0) |
Elad Efrat |
| 13:24 |
Re: factoring out the change_root() and making exp |
(0) |
Christoph Badura |
| 13:16 |
Re: factoring out the change_root() and making exp |
(0) |
Christoph Badura |
| 12:42 |
Re: on getting rid of KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER |
(1) |
Christoph Badura |
| 12:37 |
Re: factoring out prop_XXX_pack_pref() and prop_XX |
(1) |
Christoph Badura |
| 12:03 |
Re: factoring out the change_root() and making exp |
(1) |
Christoph Badura |