Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processes can hold locks

To: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processes can hold locks
From: christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:26:18 -0400

On Aug 22, 12:29pm, rmind%netbsd.org@localhost (Mindaugas Rasiukevicius) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processes can hold lock

| Yes, but we ought to keep such interface stable, since it's a lower level
| synchronisation primitive.  That is, cv_wait()/cv_wait_sig() should stay
| as functions (even if it would cost additional function-call).

Ok, I can easily do that. Should I commit my change or someone is planning
to implement a better fix?

christos

References:
- Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processes can hold locks
  - From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius

Prev by Date: Re: uarea swap-out
Next by Date: basic support for (software concept) "pci domains" in the MI pci code
Previous by Thread: Re: possible fix for: PR# 39420 - stopped processes can hold locks
Next by Thread: should gpio be moved to sys/dev from sys/sys?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index