Re: cvs better than git?

["Aaron B." <aaron%zadzmo.org@localhost>]

On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:36:23 +0200
Andreas Krey <a.krey%gmx.de@localhost> wrote:

> > Even when you have unit tests (which you should), there are still plenty 
> > of errors not caught by that. However, automatically running unit tests 
> > on all code to be committed, *before* it is committed, is also very 
> > valuable.
> 
> In git, commits are not final

As a long time SVN user trying to stay out of this discussion... I give
up. This partial sentence broke my willpower.

...if it's not final, why is it called a "commit"?

-- 
Aaron B. <aaron%zadzmo.org@localhost>