Re: cvs better than git?

[Andreas Krey <a.krey%gmx.de@localhost>]

On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 12:07:00 +0000, Johnny Billquist wrote:
...
> simple operations, and yet I waste a day or two on git instead of just 
> getting work done. For me a clear sign that the tool is wrong.

'one or two days' has a bit of a smell to it.

...
> obviously not meant for people to use on the command line. You do not 
> have 20 character long hashes as arguments to something on a command 
> line interface.

40. And you can abbreviate as far as they stay unambiguous.

...
> Call it what you want. In the end, you still have a master somewhere. 
> Which is the absolute truth of the work. And everyone else needs to sync 
> with that. And anything going in there needs to be checked before accepted.

The point being, regarding the usability of git and/or other VCSes
in the review process?

- Andreas

-- 
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800