Re: cvs better than git?

[gary%duzan.org@localhost]

> On 2020-06-21 16:07, Rhialto wrote:
>> On Sun 21 Jun 2020 at 15:20:39 +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>>> I am still curious about how to manage well in git the scenario where
>>> you do
>>> have a central repository that holds the actual source of truth, and
>>> where
>>> you want to review and approve anything that gets committed.
>>
>> Let me point you to the hell that is called "Gerrit"...
>> Example: https://review.opendev.org/
>
> Like I said. We are using gerrit. It's not without a bunch of issues all
> on its own... :-)
>
> Any other options around with similar functionality?
>
>    Johnny

   Our group at work uses Gerrit. We have had some trouble maintaining it,
so we have been considering moving to Bitbucket, which already exists
in the company. Bitbucket seems nice enough, though of course it is
commercial. If I were looking for a solution today I would consider
Phabricator/Differential, as it is open source, supports Mercurial, and
appears decent enough.

                              Gary Duzan