Re: amd64 boot broken (was: Re: sys_select() issue? (Was:Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64) ))

To: David Holland <dholland-current%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: amd64 boot broken (was: Re: sys_select() issue? (Was:Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64) ))
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:55:42 +0200

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:29:12AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> (Should it be using ffsv2? That seems a trifle odd.)

Yes, we default to ffsv2 on all archs that (supposedly) can boot from them.

Martin

References:
- Sysinst behavior change? (amd64)
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64)
  - From: Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64)
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64)
  - From: Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64)
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64)
  - From: Andreas Gustafsson
- Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64)
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64)
  - From: Paul Goyette
- sys_select() issue? (Was:Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64) )
  - From: Paul Goyette
- amd64 boot broken (was: Re: sys_select() issue? (Was:Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64) ))
  - From: David Holland

Prev by Date: assertion "anon->an_swslot == 0" failed
Next by Date: Re: assertion "anon->an_swslot == 0" failed
Previous by Thread: Re: amd64 boot broken
Next by Thread: Re: Sysinst behavior change? (amd64)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index