Re: cvs better than git?

[matthew sporleder <msporleder%gmail.com@localhost>]

> On Jun 21, 2020, at 10:32 AM, gary%duzan.org@localhost wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>>> On 2020-06-21 16:07, Rhialto wrote:
>>> On Sun 21 Jun 2020 at 15:20:39 +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>>>> I am still curious about how to manage well in git the scenario where
>>>> you do
>>>> have a central repository that holds the actual source of truth, and
>>>> where
>>>> you want to review and approve anything that gets committed.
>>> 
>>> Let me point you to the hell that is called "Gerrit"...
>>> Example: https://review.opendev.org/
>> 
>> Like I said. We are using gerrit. It's not without a bunch of issues all
>> on its own... :-)
>> 
>> Any other options around with similar functionality?
>> 
>>   Johnny
> 
>   Our group at work uses Gerrit. We have had some trouble maintaining it,
> so we have been considering moving to Bitbucket, which already exists
> in the company. Bitbucket seems nice enough, though of course it is
> commercial. If I were looking for a solution today I would consider
> Phabricator/Differential, as it is open source, supports Mercurial, and
> appears decent enough.
> 
>                              Gary Duzan
> 
> 



People like gitlab 
>