[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Subversion without python and/or Ruby?
Shouldnt be all meta packages in /meta-pkgs?
Its just causing too much confusion that way. :)
Eric Gillespie wrote:
> Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> writes:
> > Even worse -- the subversion meta package insists on "building" Sun's
> > JDK. Anyone have any luck installing that on a NetBSD/amd64 system?
> > Subversion, Python, Ruby, et. al. Are extremly portable -- Java is
> > not. I see no reason to disable the subversion meta package for all the
> > non-i386 users out there.
> > Subversion already uses the options framework -- wouldn't it make
> > sense to add Java as an option which isn't enabled by default?
> devel/subversion is not some random subset of Subversion chosen
> by the packager; it depends on all Subversion (well, all that
> we've gotten around to packaging yet ;-> ; I think it's complete,
> now that I've packaged javahl). If you want specific components,
> install them separately. Maybe all you want is subversion-base.
> Eric Gillespie <*> epg%NetBSD.org@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |