Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

adt7xxx drivers (Was Re: Device name length restriction?)



Having looked more at both the adt7463 and adt7467 drivers, as well as writing a new(ish) driver for the adt7475, it occurs to me that all of these drivers are for a single chip family and that the drivers are (or can be) nearly identical, save for the specific set of sensors supported. It seems to me that we could rather easily merge all of these drivers into a single addbc (for "Analog Devices dbCool") driver, detect the specific chip based on on-chip register contents (location is common to all of these drivers), and select the appropriate set of sensors from a chip-specific table. There are a number of additional chips in the dbCool family, and having a single driver would make it easier to support more of them, at a small cost of some table space in the kernel.

While I'm at it, I noticed that the adt7467 driver has a sysctl node to enable read/write of the Tmin registers (used to set the threshold of when fans should be sped up). Currently this sysctl lives under the machdep top-level node; I'm assuming this is because the original 7467 driver was intended only for the MacBook on which it was found. I suspect that a more appropriate place for this sysctl is under the hw top-level node.

Comments? Is it worthwhile to merge these drivers? Worth the cost of the tables? And should the sysctl be moved to hw.<dev_name>.xxx or leave it at machdep.<dev_name>.xxx ?



----------------------------------------------------------------------
|   Paul Goyette   | PGP DSS Key fingerprint: |  E-mail addresses:   |
| Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 |  paul%whooppee.com@localhost   |
| Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette%juniper.net@localhost |
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index