tech-repository by date

Last updated: Tue Oct 19 16:57:03 2010
Messages in reverse chronological order
Timezone is UTC

Page 1 of 2008/07
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
TimeSubject# followupsFrom
Thu, 31 Jul 2008
23:20 Re: preliminary version control requirements (2) Gavan Fantom
17:24 Re: Some preliminary cvs2git conversion statistics (0) Perry E. Metzger
13:03 svn version of pkgsrc tree (0) Joerg Sonnenberger
12:33 Some preliminary cvs2git conversion statistics (1) dsieger
Wed, 30 Jul 2008
22:08 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (0) Rafal Boni
21:49 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (0) Rafal Boni
21:08 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) Perry E. Metzger
21:04 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) Adam Hamsik
20:46 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (2) Rafal Boni
15:11 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (0) Perry E. Metzger
14:08 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) Alan Barrett
13:22 Re: preliminary version control requirements (0) Perry E. Metzger
13:16 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (2) Perry E. Metzger
12:11 Re: what's missing from CVS? extending CVS? (0) Perry E. Metzger
09:42 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (0) Alan Barrett
08:56 Re: what's missing from CVS? extending CVS? (0) Matthias Scheler
07:10 Re: what's missing from CVS? extending CVS? (0) Daniel Carosone
06:08 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (0) David Holland
06:05 Re: preliminary version control requirements (0) David Holland
06:03 Re: what's missing from CVS? extending CVS? (3) David Holland
05:57 Re: what's missing from CVS? extending CVS? (1) David Holland
05:55 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (0) David Holland
05:53 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (0) David Holland
05:52 Re: preliminary version control requirements (1) David Holland
05:29 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (3) David Holland
02:08 Re: what's missing from CVS? extending CVS? (1) Brian Ginsbach
Tue, 29 Jul 2008
21:32 Re: what's missing from CVS? extending CVS? (1) Perry E. Metzger
21:25 Re: what's missing from CVS? extending CVS? (1) Brian Ginsbach
20:21 Re: what's missing from CVS? extending CVS? (0) Perry E. Metzger
20:10 Re: what's missing from CVS? extending CVS? (2) Matthias Scheler
18:33 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (2) Jed Davis
17:52 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) Perry E. Metzger
17:49 Re: preliminary version control requirements (0) Perry E. Metzger
17:47 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) Perry E. Metzger
17:06 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) dsieger
16:52 Re: preliminary version control requirements (1) David Holland
16:51 Re: what's missing from CVS? extending CVS? (2) David Holland
16:45 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) David Holland
16:43 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) David Holland
16:42 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) David Holland
16:19 Re: preliminary version control requirements (1) Perry E. Metzger
16:00 Re: preliminary version control requirements (1) Alan Barrett
15:40 Re: what's missing from CVS? extending CVS? (1) Perry E. Metzger
15:10 what's missing from CVS? extending CVS? (2) Jeremy C. Reed
12:40 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (0) Adam Hamsik
12:32 is the proof in the pudding? (0) Adam Hamsik
12:24 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) dsieger
12:01 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (0) Perry E. Metzger
12:00 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) Perry E. Metzger
11:54 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) Perry E. Metzger
10:25 monotone partisans (0) Adam Hamsik
08:45 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) Mike M. Volokhov
07:30 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (0) Martin Husemann
04:44 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (2) David Holland
04:44 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (0) David Holland
04:39 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (5) David Holland
Mon, 28 Jul 2008
15:21 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) Adam Hoka
15:21 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) Perry E. Metzger
15:07 Re: preliminary version control requirements (1) Adam Hamsik
15:03 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (3) Adam Hamsik
14:25 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) Perry E. Metzger
14:21 Re: preliminary version control requirements (3) Perry E. Metzger
03:46 Re: is the proof in the pudding? (1) David Holland
03:42 Re: preliminary version control requirements (0) David Holland
03:30 Re: preliminary version control requirements (0) David Holland
03:26 Re: preliminary version control requirements (1) David Holland
Sun, 27 Jul 2008
19:13 Re: preliminary version control requirements (0) Eric Gillespie
18:54 is the proof in the pudding? (1) Perry E. Metzger
18:48 Re: preliminary version control requirements (1) Perry E. Metzger
18:41 Re: preliminary version control requirements (0) Perry E. Metzger
16:19 Re: preliminary version control requirements (0) Perry E. Metzger
15:30 Re: preliminary version control requirements (2) Julio M. Merino Vidal
11:12 Re: preliminary version control requirements (2) Matthias Scheler
11:07 Re: preliminary version control requirements (0) Adam Hoka
07:06 Re: preliminary version control requirements (1) S.P.Zeidler
01:38 Re: preliminary version control requirements (2) Perry E. Metzger
Sat, 26 Jul 2008
23:56 preliminary version control requirements (5) David Holland

Page 1 of 2008/07
[Prev Page] [Newest Page] [Oldest Page] [Next Page]
Home

Mail converted by MHonArc