On 2019-04-17 16:04, Andreas Krey wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:17:19 +0000, Sad Clouds wrote:On the other hand, if you expect "svn commit" to send the entire snapshot of your local copy to the repository, this is totally absurd.No, I expect it to atomically *check* whether the tree is up to date. Simply so I can actually control what the next revision is going to be - that it is not going to break tests etc. (I have to say that I did not even know this particular trap before this thread.)
Uh... If you want to make sure the tree is up to date, you should do a svn update, not svn commit. There is even a switch to just do the check without actually updating your local files...
But I would have thought/assumed you knew that.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt%softjar.se@localhost || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol