[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Recent i386-GENERIC panic
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, John D. Baker wrote:
First I noticed that the kernel size with the above added lines was
EXACTLY the same as without it.
Things like this lead me to suspect overly-aggressive optimisation,
as I've been burned by such in the past...
No, the KASSERT panics when mod->mod_required[i] _is_ NULL.
I realized that a couple of hour later. Attention was divided when I
wrote the previous message.
It might be more clear to use the following debug printf's:
In addition to printing out the dependencies, it will hopefully tell us which
call is returning NULL.
I'm updating for the alternate set of machines now. If they complain,
I'll try out the patch. Actually, I'll try it on them anyway.
|/"\ John D. Baker, KN5UKS NetBSD Darwin/MacOS X
|\ / jdbaker[snail]mylinuxisp[flyspeck]com OpenBSD FreeBSD
| X No HTML/proprietary data in email. BSD just sits there and works!
|/ \ GPGkeyID: D703 4A7E 479F 63F8 D3F4 BD99 9572 8F23 E4AD 1645
Main Index |
Thread Index |