[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Using coccinelle for (quick?) syntax fixing
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 07:40:38PM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 12:11:32 -0500, Eric Haszlakiewicz
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 10:49:05PM +0200, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> >> Note also that I applied the spatch against sys/; the rest of src could
> >> get a scan. But I would prefer to look for other static analyzers
> >> perhaps there are more suitable (and faster) ones.
> > If you're talking about static analyzers, wouldn't coverity count?
> $ cd /usr/pkgsrc/*/coverity/
> ksh: cd: /usr/pkgsrc/*/coverity - No such file or directory
It wouldn't do you any good even if it was there: if you're going to run
it yourself you need to buy a license. Even if you could run it yourself
you wouldn't have the benefit of using the existing, pre-classified list
of defects on coverity's site.
Main Index |
Thread Index |