Re: WAPBL vs. dump(8)

[Matthias Scheler <tron%zhadum.org.uk@localhost>]

On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 01:34:41PM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 12:28:09PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 02:26:26PM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> > > > expected next file 55, got 54
> > > 
> > > Just a guess: the log inode?
> > 
> > I've reinitialized all file systems on that machine with "newfs -s -64M".
> > I thought it would not use an internal journal in that case.
> 
> Up to rev 1.2 of sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_wapbl.c there was a bug:

I still get the message when I restore a dump created on a machine
with a 2008-08-06 kernel.

Will WAPBL start using the area at the end of the disk if it has
previosuly used a journal inside the filesystem?

        Kind regards

-- 
Matthias Scheler                                  http://zhadum.org.uk/