[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: WAPBL vs. dump(8)
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 02:26:26PM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> > expected next file 55, got 54
> Just a guess: the log inode?
I've reinitialized all file systems on that machine with "newfs -s -64M".
I thought it would not use an internal journal in that case.
> We could of course teach dump to ignore SF_LOG inodes.
That would probably make sense.
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
Main Index |
Thread Index |