Re: WAPBL vs. dump(8)

[Matthias Scheler <tron%zhadum.org.uk@localhost>]

On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 02:26:26PM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> > expected next file 55, got 54
> 
> Just a guess: the log inode?

I've reinitialized all file systems on that machine with "newfs -s -64M".
I thought it would not use an internal journal in that case.

> We could of course teach dump to ignore SF_LOG inodes.

That would probably make sense.

        Kind regards

-- 
Matthias Scheler                                  http://zhadum.org.uk/