[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: WAPBL vs. dump(8)
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 01:13:54PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> is it possible what WAPBL and dump(8) aren't fully compatible? I've
> noticed errors like this twice when attempting to "restore" a file
> from a backup of file system mount with the logging option:
> expected next file 55, got 54
Just a guess: the log inode? This is harmless as all you get is
one superfluous inode on the dump.
We could of course teach dump to ignore SF_LOG inodes.
Juergen Hannken-Illjes - hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost - TU Braunschweig
Main Index |
Thread Index |