[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: WAPBL vs. dump(8)
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 12:28:09PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 02:26:26PM +0200, Juergen Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> > > expected next file 55, got 54
> > Just a guess: the log inode?
> I've reinitialized all file systems on that machine with "newfs -s -64M".
> I thought it would not use an internal journal in that case.
Up to rev 1.2 of sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_wapbl.c there was a bug:
When checking if there's enough space at the end of a partition,
compare bytes vs bytes, not sectors vs bytes.
> > We could of course teach dump to ignore SF_LOG inodes.
> That would probably make sense.
> Kind regards
> Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
Juergen Hannken-Illjes - hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost - TU Braunschweig
Main Index |
Thread Index |