[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Adding c++11 support to USE_LANGUAGES
* On 2017-04-28 at 11:05 BST, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
> * On 2017-04-24 at 13:50 BST, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> > > Is C++n a superset of C++m for n>m?
> > Mostly. There are a couple of things that explicitly create problems for
> > m == 2003 and there is the problem of at least one semantic change that
> > can potentially result in miscompiled code (destructors are tagged as
> > not throwing by default in 2011). For m>=2011 it should be transparent.
> In that case what about something like this:
> tl;dr: introduce CXX_REQD as a similar mechanism to GCC_REQD, packages
> append to it what they need, then we distil it to the most recent
> version and use that for the build.
Joerg suggested rolling this into USE_LANGUAGES instead. I've done
that here and kicked off a bulk build:
One of the issues I've realised is that neither this nor the CXX_REQD
patch will work in bl3 files if compiler.mk has already been read.
I'm not sure there's a great solution for that, so at least
integrating this into USE_LANGUAGES should get us existing pkglint
warnings about setting it after compiler.mk.
Please help testing on NetBSD, especially with problematic packages
like libreoffice, I don't yet have a fast NetBSD VM to test in.
Jonathan Perkin - Joyent, Inc. - www.joyent.com
Main Index |
Thread Index |