[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Adding c++11 support to USE_LANGUAGES
From: Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%joyent.com@localhost>, Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 08:10:37 +0100
> * On 2017-04-28 at 11:05 BST, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
>> * On 2017-04-24 at 13:50 BST, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 02:07:17PM +0200, Edgar Fuß wrote:
>> > > Is C++n a superset of C++m for n>m?
>> > Mostly. There are a couple of things that explicitly create problems for
>> > m == 2003 and there is the problem of at least one semantic change that
>> > can potentially result in miscompiled code (destructors are tagged as
>> > not throwing by default in 2011). For m>=2011 it should be transparent.
>> In that case what about something like this:
>> tl;dr: introduce CXX_REQD as a similar mechanism to GCC_REQD, packages
>> append to it what they need, then we distil it to the most recent
>> version and use that for the build.
> Joerg suggested rolling this into USE_LANGUAGES instead. I've done
> that here and kicked off a bulk build:
> One of the issues I've realised is that neither this nor the CXX_REQD
> patch will work in bl3 files if compiler.mk has already been read.
> I'm not sure there's a great solution for that, so at least
> integrating this into USE_LANGUAGES should get us existing pkglint
> warnings about setting it after compiler.mk.
> Please help testing on NetBSD, especially with problematic packages
> like libreoffice, I don't yet have a fast NetBSD VM to test in.
I will test this change for mk/compiler.mk for misc/libreoffice
and www/firefox on NetBSD.
> Jonathan Perkin - Joyent, Inc. - www.joyent.com
Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost
PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3
Main Index |
Thread Index |