tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pthread library related

To: Charles Cui <charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: pthread library related
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 20:29:58 +0200

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:33:33AM -0700, Charles Cui wrote:

> The second one is the reimplementation of bsd signal.

Do we really need this? Why is it a function pointer?

> The third one is the missing kernel logic for _SC_SEM_NSEMS_MAX.

Why not use atomic_inc/atomic_dec for the p_nsem count (and a proper
atomic-friendly type instead of uint)? Why limit the number at all?

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pthread library related
  - From: Christos Zoulas

References:
- Re: pthread library related
  - From: Charles Cui
- Re: pthread library related
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: pthread library related
  - From: Charles Cui
- Re: pthread library related
  - From: Charles Cui

Prev by Date: Re: Minor updates to sort ?
Next by Date: Re: pthread library related
Previous by Thread: Re: pthread library related
Next by Thread: Re: pthread library related
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index