tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pthread library related

On May 30,  8:29pm, (Martin Husemann) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: pthread library related

| Do we really need this? Why is it a function pointer?

It is the same as signal.

| > The third one is the missing kernel logic for _SC_SEM_NSEMS_MAX.
| Why not use atomic_inc/atomic_dec for the p_nsem count (and a proper
| atomic-friendly type instead of uint)? Why limit the number at all?



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index