Re: Broken binaries again

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 09:54:49AM +0300, Aleksey Cheusov wrote:
> 
>  >> As Joerg said there are a few packages that cannot
>  >> generate correct
>  >> REQUIRES for a number of reasons.
>  >> We need a mechanism in pkgsrc for marking such packages as such.
>  >> And then we'll have a chance to have no output from 'pkg_lint_summary -l'
>  >> and no annoying periodic emails.
> 
> > CHECK_SHLIBS_SUPPORTED=     NO
> 
> Thanks. As far as I can see this variable is widely used in packages.
> However there is one problem with it. It disables both PROVIDES and
> REQUIRES but only REQUIRES should be disabled. Disabling the former may
> break PROVIDES/REQUIRES consistency with other packages.
> 
> The following patch solves the problem of temporary directories in
> REQUIRES. I raised it in November.
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2011/11/19/msg008014.html
> 
> Objections?

Objected.

Joerg