[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: gvfs, samba
Mike Pumford <mpumford%mudcovered.org.uk@localhost> writes:
> On 14/03/2020 18:28, Tom Spindler (moof) wrote:
>> FWIW, you *can* build samba4 without all the AD domain controller stuff
>> and just use it in nmbd+smbd mode; I have a local patch to do just that
>> (--without-ad-dc, mostly) and it seems to work without issues.
> I'm curious to know why you think that requires modification to work?
> I use the stock samba4 package(no build options) in a domainless
> environment without issue on NetBSD8 and NetBSD9. Is this some sort of
> space saving thing?
Tom sent me a patch (that does some other things too) offlist. It is
not about making it work. It is just about not building the DC stuff,
which I think might also avoid some dependencies.
So yes, it's space, build time, etc.
In an ideal world, there'd be a split package for the controlller, as
the vast majority of pkgsrc samba users don't run a DC. (Well, in an
ideal world, nobody would need samba at all!)
Main Index |
Thread Index |