[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: gvfs, samba
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 at 21:12, Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost> wrote:
> I found the following dependency chain
> and something else wants talloc which conflicts with samba (3).
> Now, I see samba is optional in gvfs, and I wonder:
> should we flip it to off
> should we change it to samba4
I don't know the right decision, but it is annoying if one builds gvfs
as a dependency to get samba3 forced upon; I'd think if switching to
samba4 is not very hard, to do just that, perhaps as an option.
> The net/samba (3) and net/samba4 DESCR files do not give statements
> about if 3 is mainstream and 4 bleeding edge vs 3 crufty and 4
> mainstream. I bet it's that 4 is normal now.
> Thoughts? Barring none, I'll perhaps do something after I investigate.
Main Index |
Thread Index |