[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Binary packages (again)
(PLEASE STOP CC to ME, I've just want to said, "TNF pkgsrc build machines
binary packages for 5.1.2 instead of 5.0.2"!)
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 18:57:40 +0900, Aleksey Cheusov <cheusov%tut.by@localhost>
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Luca Sironi <luca%sironi.tk@localhost> wrote:
As for the third number on the release version
Panoramix2# pkg_add ettercap-NG
pkg_add: Warning: package `ettercap-NG-0.7.3nb5' was built for a platform:
pkg_add: NetBSD/i386 5.1 (pkg) vs. NetBSD/i386 5.1.2 (this host)
I guess these warnings are useless, right?
Yes. You are right.
Such warnings should definitely be fixed.
The real fix is system-dependent, though.
On Linux, for example, kernel version doesn't matter at all.
I wondered we may define default acceptable patterns,
for example, NetBSD:
Then, we can additionally put following pkg's Makefile currently depending on
For document only packages:
Of course, PKG_ACCEPTABLE_PLATFORM must be included in binary package, and
related tools must handle it properly.
OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |