Re: BIND DNS from base vs. pkg

To: Steve Rikli <sr%genyosha.net@localhost>, netbsd-users%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: BIND DNS from base vs. pkg
From: Niels Dettenbach <nd%syndicat.com@localhost>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 12:49:04 +0100

Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2026, 22:52:01 UTC+00:00:01 schrieben Sie:
> Wrt BIND in particular, I try to follow ISC guidelines. So when they say
> 9.18.50 is EOL I prefer to avoid it.
I had email contact with ISC directly 4 weeks ago where they stated 
explicitely dont use 9.18 anymore productively / upgrade to current 9.20.

hth,


niels.

-- 
 ---
 Niels Dettenbach
 Syndicat IT & Internet
 https://www.syndicat.com
 PGP: https://syndicat.com/pub_key.asc
 ---

References:
- BIND DNS from base vs. pkg
  - From: Steve Rikli
- Re: BIND DNS from base vs. pkg
  - From: Greg Troxel
- Re: BIND DNS from base vs. pkg
  - From: Steve Rikli

Prev by Date: Re: wired memory leak?
Next by Date: Re: wired memory leak?
Previous by Thread: Re: BIND DNS from base vs. pkg
Next by Thread: Potential cgdconfig bug on NetBSD 11 usb installer...?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index