NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Mailing list manager on NetBSD



Mayuresh wrote in <20190110020002.GB10716@localhost>:
 |On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:54:49PM +0100, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
 |> when i used it.  (There should be posts on their ML on that,
 |> a couple of years back.)  If your users use MIME you have to hook
 |> in scripts, and then it becomes more expensive...  Having said
 |> that, AlpineLinux seems to use it for their MLs, and it seems to
 |> work.  But there all people use 7-bit clean text mails only.
 |
 |Plain text restriction is suitable (in fact better from storage point of
 |view) for my purpose but can't "fix" everybody's mail client. Most people
 |won't do that. So, yes, if I have to process (such as throw away MIME and
 |retain only text) it will add up.

And/or do not use footer or such injections otherwise, it will
render the message invalid.  (Therefore i heave only injected header
fields, because i definitely did not want to add some MIME
wrapper.  "Retain only text" means there are only natively
american speaking people i will assume.)

 |BTW I am not too sure whether mlmmj's mailing list is active. 2018 is
 |conspicuously absent in the archives[1]. (At least archives are not being
 |produced, but how can it remain in that state.)

I see.  Ah, i was posting in February 2016.  Ah, yes, do not set
memorymailsize but to 0 if you want identical behaviour for
messages which fit it and those which do not.  Do set moderators
otherwise it crashes.  I seem to recall that my moderator did not
get some messages somehow, which was the final reason why i have
switched to mailman (later on).  These (but the last, which
definetely could have been postfix misconfiguration also, but i do
not think so) are all corner cases, however.

 |I enquired about this on their list and hardly drew any response - except
 |from 1 user who echoed similar concern. I have to assume their ML to be
 |deeply dormant if not dead.

Maybe your message simply was not "meaningful" enough.  Mr.
Schmitt seems to make fine differentiations (citing his last
response to the other thread in February 2016), maybe not only for
me, but also for you!  You could start your messages with "i am
_not_ a friend of .." to get yourself started.  ;)  It could help!

Other than that, on my VM i see GNU mailman processing messages to
list members in intervals of two seconds (two seconds/one
message), which is possibly also a misconfiguration however (as it
is hard to believe other lists could be driven with it like that).
A nice day i wish,

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index