NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Replacing Postfix



At 13:31 Uhr -0800 20.12.2010, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> But, to explain further - most setups do not need or want a heavyweight
>> MTA.  Heavyweight?
>>
>>  492 postfix   85    0    19M 2440K kqueue     0:00  0.00%  0.00% qmgr
>>  508 postfix   85    0    19M 2412K kqueue     0:00  0.00%  0.00% pickup
>>  500 root      85    0    19M 2408K kqueue     0:00  0.00%  0.00% master
>
>Add another ~2MB resident if you also have tlsmgr running.  :-)  But yes,
>Postfix strikes me as very lightweight compared to most alternative MTAs.

It does?

% pkg_info |grep sendmail
sendmail-8.14.4     The well known Mail Transport Agent
% top -1 | grep -E 'sendmail|smmsp'
  701 root      85    0  3040K  992K select     2:33  0.00%  0.00% sendmail
  586 smmsp     85    0  3040K  884K pause      0:01  0.00%  0.00% sendmail
%

(netbsd-5/i386, up 81d)

        hauke

-- 
     The ASCII Ribbon Campaign                    Hauke Fath
()     No HTML/RTF in email            Institut für Nachrichtentechnik
/\     No Word docs in email                     TU Darmstadt
     Respect for open standards              Ruf +49-6151-16-3281


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index