NetBSD-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Replacing Postfix
At 13:31 Uhr -0800 20.12.2010, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>> But, to explain further - most setups do not need or want a heavyweight
>> MTA. Heavyweight?
>>
>> 492 postfix 85 0 19M 2440K kqueue 0:00 0.00% 0.00% qmgr
>> 508 postfix 85 0 19M 2412K kqueue 0:00 0.00% 0.00% pickup
>> 500 root 85 0 19M 2408K kqueue 0:00 0.00% 0.00% master
>
>Add another ~2MB resident if you also have tlsmgr running. :-) But yes,
>Postfix strikes me as very lightweight compared to most alternative MTAs.
It does?
% pkg_info |grep sendmail
sendmail-8.14.4 The well known Mail Transport Agent
% top -1 | grep -E 'sendmail|smmsp'
701 root 85 0 3040K 992K select 2:33 0.00% 0.00% sendmail
586 smmsp 85 0 3040K 884K pause 0:01 0.00% 0.00% sendmail
%
(netbsd-5/i386, up 81d)
hauke
--
The ASCII Ribbon Campaign Hauke Fath
() No HTML/RTF in email Institut für Nachrichtentechnik
/\ No Word docs in email TU Darmstadt
Respect for open standards Ruf +49-6151-16-3281
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index