[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Questions about filesystem choice
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:01 PM, DL <devinlasalle%hotmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> Hello all -
> I am aiming (in my very first attempt to run NetBSD) to install NetBSD to run
> VERY limited use database for access to a small amount of data and files (less
> than 1000MB). If I can get the 5.1 RC2 sysinst to do it (crossing my
> fingers) I
> am going to attempt to install / (including the kernel) onto a 256MB flash
> (wd0) and everything else that will be written frequently (swap, /home, /var,
> /usr) to a SCSI disk (sd0).
> Note: for whatever it may be worth I THINK I have to run / from wd0 because
> sparc64 machine I'm using will need the the modules to run the SCSI controller
> before it can use whatever is on the SCSI disk.
> My question at the moment: sysinst presents a lot of choices for filesystems
> install the minimal base and etc sets and I am not finding much in the way of
> comparisons of these filesystems available for NetBSD. Any thoughts on what
> filesystem(s) (i.e. FFSv1, FFSv2, etc) might be both reliable for running /
> perhaps advantageous for extending the life of a flash disk which has some
> limited number of write cycles before it dies?
sysinstall doesn't have a great concept of moving files around so you
might need to end up doing some manual post-install cpio.
I wrote the following to reduce disk access if you're not going to try
and go full read-only:
Main Index |
Thread Index |