NetBSD-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Xorg and thinkpad x200s
Hello,
the bios was already on AHCI...
That's really bad. I am looking forward to using NetBSD on this laptop
for my production system, and this is a "feature" I would really need.
Look at this:
# sysctl hw.acpi.supported_states
hw.acpi.supported_states = S0 S3 S4 S5
# dmesg | grep pciide0
pciide0 at pci0 dev 3 function 2: vendor 0x8086 product 0x2a46 (rev. 0x07)
pciide0: bus-master DMA support present, but unused (no driver support)
pciide0: primary channel wired to native-PCI mode
pciide0: using ioapic0 pin 18 for native-PCI interrupt
atabus0 at pciide0 channel 0
pciide0: secondary channel wired to native-PCI mode
atabus1 at pciide0 channel 1
Devices without power management support: pciide0
Indeed:
Jan 11 14:00:18 /netbsd: acpi0: entering state 3
Jan 11 14:00:18 /netbsd: Devices without power management support: pciide0
Jan 11 14:00:18 /netbsd: acpi0: aborting suspend
Jan 11 14:04:39 /netbsd: acpi0: entering state 3
Jan 11 14:04:39 /netbsd: Devices without power management support: pciide0
Jan 11 14:04:39 /netbsd: acpi0: aborting suspend
Jan 11 14:04:44 /netbsd: acpi0: entering state 4
Jan 11 14:04:44 /netbsd: Devices without power management support: pciide0
Jan 11 14:04:44 /netbsd: acpi0: aborting suspend
So: No suspend or standby...
Thanks
Pau
2010/1/11 Steven Bellovin <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost>:
>
> On Jan 10, 2010, at 7:24 PM, Pau wrote:
>
>> It didn't work... I guess this means that acpi + suspend is not
>> supported on this laptop...
>>
>> Jan 11 02:08:48 powerd[442]: /etc/powerd/scripts/sleep_button exited
>> with status 1
>> Jan 11 02:09:02 /netbsd: acpi0: entering state 3
>> Jan 11 02:09:02 /netbsd: Devices without power management support: pciide0
>> Jan 11 02:09:02 /netbsd: acpi0: aborting suspend
>>
> Actually, that's a very good sign, because it shows where the problem is, and
> I suspect there's a work-around.
>
> Go into the BIOS configuration and check what the interface options are for
> the disk. If there's an option for AHCI, try it instead. (Aside: per
> another thread on disk performance, I reconfigured a desktop of mine to use
> AHCI instead of the default SATA. I literally got a 10x performance
> improvement.)
>
>
> --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
>
>
>
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index