Stephen Borrill <netbsd%precedence.co.uk@localhost> writes: > The clue there is the "netbsd-5-0" stanza. As Joerg says this is a > known issue in the netbsd-5-0 branch (i.e. NetBSD 5.0, NetBSD 5.0.1 > and the upcoming NetBSD 5.0.2). If you look for the netbsd-5 branch > (i.e. what will become NetBSD 5.1 soon) you will find it works fine (I > can confirm it works on 2TB drives). And further, unless you have really unusual stability concerns (typically with a staff to do regression testing of new bits before going to production and people on 24x7 pagers), you almost certainly should be running netbsd-5 instead of netbsd-5-0. netbsd-5 is actually highly stable.
Description: PGP signature