[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: threaded programs report bogus process size ?
christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
> | Looking from tail is not good for cache, I think PTQ_FIRST() should be
> | attempted first. Otherwise, loop looks OK to me.
> | Though _lwp_kill() with lock held might have small effect to concurrency,
> | but it's very unlikely case, especially if do unlocked check for PTQ_FIRST
> | ().
> then s/_REVERSE// instead...
After re-thinking... s/_REVERSE// should be enough, not worth complicating.
Main Index |
Thread Index |