Re: threaded programs report bogus process size ?

[Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>]

Hello,

christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
> | Looking from tail is not good for cache, I think PTQ_FIRST() should be
> | attempted first.  Otherwise, loop looks OK to me.
> | 
> | Though _lwp_kill() with lock held might have small effect to concurrency,
> | but it's very unlikely case, especially if do unlocked check for PTQ_FIRST
> | ().
> 
> then s/_REVERSE// instead...

After re-thinking... s/_REVERSE// should be enough, not worth complicating.

Please commit.

-- 
Mindaugas