[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: threaded programs report bogus process size ?
On Oct 2, 12:16am, rmind%netbsd.org@localhost (Mindaugas Rasiukevicius) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: threaded programs report bogus process size ?
| christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
| > >Patch is wrong. Apart from unnecessary re-lock in the loop and lock leak
| > >after - consider the case when 'first_thread' after re-insertion into the
| > >queue gets taken out by other pthread_create(). Infinite loop.
| > Here's a simpler one.
| Looking from tail is not good for cache, I think PTQ_FIRST() should be
| attempted first. Otherwise, loop looks OK to me.
| Though _lwp_kill() with lock held might have small effect to concurrency,
| but it's very unlikely case, especially if do unlocked check for PTQ_FIRST().
then s/_REVERSE// instead...
Main Index |
Thread Index |