[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: threaded programs report bogus process size ?
On Oct 3, 10:26pm, rmind%netbsd.org@localhost (Mindaugas Rasiukevicius) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: threaded programs report bogus process size ?
| christos%zoulas.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas) wrote:
| > | Looking from tail is not good for cache, I think PTQ_FIRST() should be
| > | attempted first. Otherwise, loop looks OK to me.
| > |
| > | Though _lwp_kill() with lock held might have small effect to concurrency,
| > | but it's very unlikely case, especially if do unlocked check for PTQ_FIRST
| > | ().
| > then s/_REVERSE// instead...
| After re-thinking... s/_REVERSE// should be enough, not worth complicating.
| Please commit.
Main Index |
Thread Index |