[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: WAPBL vs. dump(8)
Juergen Hannken-Illjes <hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 01:13:54PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
>> is it possible what WAPBL and dump(8) aren't fully compatible? I've
>> noticed errors like this twice when attempting to "restore" a file
>> from a backup of file system mount with the logging option:
>> expected next file 55, got 54
> Just a guess: the log inode? This is harmless as all you get is
> one superfluous inode on the dump.
> We could of course teach dump to ignore SF_LOG inodes.
Not just could, should...
Perry E. Metzger perry%piermont.com@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |